2020
DOI: 10.2112/jcr-si110-030.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Maritime Laws Based on China's Maritime Power Strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assume that State A is a party to the Hague Rules while State B of the Hamburg Rules. In this case, there may be a conflict of conventions for the following reasons: -the bill of lading is issued in State A and the port of loading is in State B, -the bill of lading is issued in State A and the port of unloading is in State B, -the bill of lading is issued in State A and one of the ports of unloading available for selection is in State B, -the bill of lading is issued in State A, but at the same time contains the so-called Paramount clause in favor of the Hamburg rules [16,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume that State A is a party to the Hague Rules while State B of the Hamburg Rules. In this case, there may be a conflict of conventions for the following reasons: -the bill of lading is issued in State A and the port of loading is in State B, -the bill of lading is issued in State A and the port of unloading is in State B, -the bill of lading is issued in State A and one of the ports of unloading available for selection is in State B, -the bill of lading is issued in State A, but at the same time contains the so-called Paramount clause in favor of the Hamburg rules [16,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%