We read with great interest the retrospective study by Marx et al. 1 reporting endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) treatment in 27 patients with sporadic, G1, nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) (mean lesion size 14 AE 4.6 mm). There was a 93% complete response, with three cases of severe acute pancreatitis (11.1%), which evolved into a pancreatic fluid collection requiring EUS-guided drainage. These patients had lesion diameter of 10, 10, and 9 mm and an age ranging from 58 to 66. 1 Was performance of EUS-RFA indicated in these patients? The European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society guidelines recommends surveillance in patients with lesions <20 mm. However, the level of evidence beyond this conclusion is extremely low. 2 Conversely, in surgical series, about 30% of small NF-pNETs are operated, with serious adverse events (AEs) in 18-32% of cases. 3,4 EUS-RFA has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery. When a new therapeutic modality is introduced, proper patient selection is critical in order to preserve your gun from a rapid and irreversible failure. In our opinion, this was not the case in the paper by Marx et al., 1 where grade III AEs ocurred in NF-pNETs ≤10 mm, which may never ever grow up and in which control of RFA current dispersion might be difficult, also if the smallest 5 mm needle was utilized, as we assume.A recent systematic review has reported 93% effectiveness and no major AEs (mean lesion size 16 mm). 5 If this is the case, we believe we should keep shooting EUS-RFA for small selected NF-pNETs, with size ranging from 14-15 to 20 mm, especially those located in the pancreatic head, while balancing other patient and lesion variables. 2 With this in mind, these patients should be offered EUS-RFA, surveillance and surgery to make them able to take their most appropriate personal decision.