2021
DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1886076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of out-of hospital cardiac arrest patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 2021

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From these 12 segments, seven segments belong to the shockable class, misclassified as non-shockable signals. As mentioned in [38], not advising shock for a patient with shockable signal might lead to their death, but fortunately, in this study, the rate of this kind of misclassification is only 3.87%. A quick review of…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…From these 12 segments, seven segments belong to the shockable class, misclassified as non-shockable signals. As mentioned in [38], not advising shock for a patient with shockable signal might lead to their death, but fortunately, in this study, the rate of this kind of misclassification is only 3.87%. A quick review of…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…4 Due to the fact that ECMO cannulation in eCPR is performed during chest compressions, the underlying cause of the cardiac arrest often remains unclear, while at least 70% of cases are cardiac-related. 5…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was one article with otherwise detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria which did not report the composition of the personnel involved, which therefore had to be excluded in the review. Since there are team compositions ranging from 2 to 8 members for the same procedure, there might be room for improving e ciency and lowering programme costs [26,29]. The extracted personnel statistics would have been of more interest if there were studies on cost e ciency comparing personnel costswhich is worth investigating in the future when more studies on the costs for ECPR for refractory CA have been published [71][72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracted personnel statistics would have been of more interest if there were studies on cost e ciency comparing personnel costswhich is worth investigating in the future when more studies on the costs for ECPR for refractory CA have been published [71][72][73][74][75]. Regarding team composition, some studies found it important to mention the specialties of the physicians but omitted mentioning the specialties of the nurses, while others even included the driver of the mobile programme [20,29]. It is di cult to imagine that studies that mention only 2 physicians did not require help from nurses or other professions [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%