2000
DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1999.2206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of patients with myocardial infarction and hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, we used a glucose level of greater than 140 mg/dl as the cut-off level for fasting glucose, as some of the earlier studies do [10]. In addition, the acute coronary event may be accompanied by elevated blood pressure either because of acute stress or secondary to previous hypertension or hypotension, mostly because of marked reduction in cardiac output as a result of extensive infarction [24]. As the blood pressure obtained in the acute phase of MI may not be representative of a patient's true blood pressure level, patients reporting a history of hypertension and patients under antihypertensive therapy were defined as having hypertension regardless of the blood pressure value measured on admission.…”
Section: Months After Acute Myocardial Infarctionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Accordingly, we used a glucose level of greater than 140 mg/dl as the cut-off level for fasting glucose, as some of the earlier studies do [10]. In addition, the acute coronary event may be accompanied by elevated blood pressure either because of acute stress or secondary to previous hypertension or hypotension, mostly because of marked reduction in cardiac output as a result of extensive infarction [24]. As the blood pressure obtained in the acute phase of MI may not be representative of a patient's true blood pressure level, patients reporting a history of hypertension and patients under antihypertensive therapy were defined as having hypertension regardless of the blood pressure value measured on admission.…”
Section: Months After Acute Myocardial Infarctionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In patients with heart failure, previous MI or angina, b-blockers may be an appropriate choice as the third agent [3], since they may help to reduce recurrent MI and mortality through protective actions on the ischemic myocardial tissue and antiarrhythmic properties [101]. CCBs, on the other hand, should be avoided in patients with congestive heart failure unless they are required to control the symptoms of angina [3,5,102].…”
Section: Review | Neutelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, although intravenous beta-blockers are not necessarily recommended for all patients, the early treatment of all patients without contraindications with a beta-blocker is strongly supported by evidence and guidelines. There is compelling evidence that beta-blocker as secondary prevention reduces the risk of all cause mortality, coronary mortality, recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction and sudden death in patients [56]. This is manifest clinically from large scale trials utilising beta blocker within hours or days [57].…”
Section: Beta-blocker In Acsmentioning
confidence: 99%