2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-018-03675-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of pelvic discontinuity in revision arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When grading acetabular defects in revision arthroplasty after THR there is a need for a universal and valid system [17]. Precise classification of acetabular defects has always been a complex problem [7,17]. Therefore, it is vital to provide a classification system that reliably describes the criteria of the acetabular structure and directly relates to surgical management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When grading acetabular defects in revision arthroplasty after THR there is a need for a universal and valid system [17]. Precise classification of acetabular defects has always been a complex problem [7,17]. Therefore, it is vital to provide a classification system that reliably describes the criteria of the acetabular structure and directly relates to surgical management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3) is based on the presence or absence of supporting structures, such as the acetabular rim, superior dome, medial wall, anterior and posterior columns, and the surgeon's assessment of these structures' capacity to support the revision prosthesis [19]. This classification system gained wide acceptance [7,22]. The original classification system was developed by evaluating 147 patients with AP X-ray imaging, classifying each as type I, II, or III [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations