2014
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of pelvic ring fracture patients with a pelvic “blush” on early computed tomography

Abstract: Therapeutic study, level IV. Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4,6,8,10) The incidence of blush-positive patients in the current is higher than that of other studies. (13,14) This difference could be caused by subject selection. Other studies were performed for the all pelvic fracture patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4,6,8,10) The incidence of blush-positive patients in the current is higher than that of other studies. (13,14) This difference could be caused by subject selection. Other studies were performed for the all pelvic fracture patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies were performed for the all pelvic fracture patients. (13,14) However, this study only includes the pelvic fracture patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the author`s trauma center during the study period. Therefore, the pelvic fractures in this study could be more severe than that of other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hemodynamic instability and/or contrast extravasation at computer tomography (CT) examination are reliable indicators of arterial injury [6]. In patients with pelvic fractures, contrast extravasation on the arterial phase CT scans is encountered frequently; thereafter, the need for intervention seems to be determined by the presence of clinical signs of ongoing bleeding [7]. To improve survival of hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures, the hemorrhage must be stopped immediately [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that have been done of angiography/embolization are difficult to directly compare with PPP because indications for intervention for pelvic fracture related hemorrhage or angiography vary from institution to institution; for example, some institutions send every unstable patient with a pelvic fracture directly to angiography, while some patients are excluded with a positive FAST; other institutions only send patients with a positive blush on CT scan, a large pelvic hematoma, or persistent hypotension [8, 9, 15•, 28, 37•, 45, 47•, 48, 49]. It has been recognized that a blush on CT scan is not a specific indicator of need for angioembolization [11]. While there is a role for angioembolization, there are potential deterrents to using this as a first-line treatment.…”
Section: Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crucial point in the decision-making process, however, is identifying the pelvis as a possible site of post-traumatic bleeding. With one third of pelvic fracture-related mortality due to uncontrolled hemorrhage [10][11][12], early identification of this potential source during the evaluation is paramount. This permits institution of damage control resuscitation and operative techniques, if needed, to prevent early exsanguination and the lethal triad of hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acidosis that can follow hemorrhage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%