2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of post-photorefractive keratectomy pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15,20 However, its effect was not sufficiently satisfactory. In addition, there was risk of Steven-Johnson syndrome, which could induce irreversible systemic and ocular surface damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,20 However, its effect was not sufficiently satisfactory. In addition, there was risk of Steven-Johnson syndrome, which could induce irreversible systemic and ocular surface damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most surgeons use topical NSAIDs no more than 3 or 4 times a day for 3 days after surgery. 4,43,57 Ketorolac: Topical ketorolac tromethamine is an NSAID with proven analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity. It has showed efficacy in controlling pain after PRK through diverse studies including randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Acute Pain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms include foreign body sensation, light sensitivity, tearing, irritation, itching, and burning, peaking about 24 hours after surgery and typically decreasing within 72 hours after surgery, when reepithelialization is complete. 4 Furthermore, the presence of a chronic dry eye syndrome is well recognized. 5 Several pathophysiological mechanisms are involved.…”
Section: ' Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrastromal techniques are the most widely used, but surface ablation techniques still have a relevant role [1][2][3]. Surface ablation techniques are often preferred in eyes with thin corneas, superficial corneal scars, anterior basement membrane dystrophies, dry-eye syndrome and as re-treatment following small-incision lenticule extraction or in patients predisposed for contact injury [4][5][6][7]. Disadvantages of surface ablation techniques include a relatively long visual recovery period, postoperative pain, and higher risk of corneal haze and myopic regression as compared to intrastromal techniques, especially when treating high degrees of myopia [2,5,6,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disadvantages of surface ablation techniques include a relatively long visual recovery period, postoperative pain, and higher risk of corneal haze and myopic regression as compared to intrastromal techniques, especially when treating high degrees of myopia [2,5,6,8,9]. Technological advancements with larger optical zones, corneal cooling, epithelial repositioning, mitomycin C, and highfrequency flying-spot excimer lasers with eye-trackers have improved outcomes and reduced the risk of complications after surface ablation techniques [3,7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The umbrella term for many of these improvements is "advanced surface ablation," which includes photorefractive keratectomy with cooling (cPRK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK), among others [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%