This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of an orthotic device in treating proximal humerus fractures. The following research methods were used Orthosis user group compare to the non-orthotic user group in terms of PHFs management. Physical function in daily activities and recovery were assessed using the DASH, SPADI, SST, Muscular Strength, and CONSTANT scores, radiological assessment, as well as the Orthosis questionnaire AND mathematically (statistical data processing). Based on the data normality results and clinical outcomes, a statistically significant difference between two groups was illustrate, the orthosis user group indicating a minimum level of inability, pain severity and a lack of functional skills to execute specific activities, had higher shoulder function and activity muscle strength recovered to a normal level, more effective in preserving and promoting arm function, as well as allowing for better functional mobility. Bone union indicating that the orthosis user group allowed the fracture to heal while providing sufficient support and stability. Furthermore, an orthosis satisfaction survey found that patients were fell protected and comfortable with the new orthosis.