guidelines, whether they were certified providers of advanced cardiac life support or advanced life support, and postgraduate qualifications. Each doctor's management of ventricular fibrillation was compared with the protocol stipulated in the council's guidelines.The results were analysed by X2 analysis. We contacted 113 doctors, all of whom agreed to participate in the survey. Twenty were registrars, 50 senior house officers, and 43 house officers. Fifty six doctors led the cardiac arrest team.Thirty two doctors knew the full sequence of managing ventricular fibrillation, and 49 knew the initial management; 32 were unable to state correctly the initial management. Minor mistakes such as omitting the precordial thump were ignored. The major mistakes are shown in the Only 45 knew that the guidelines were those of the European Resuscitation Council. Forty eight doctors were taught the guidelines at inhouse training programmes, most of which were induction courses for junior doctors. Forty eight had read the guidelines in material from inhouse training programmes, 30 had read them in publicity material such as wall posters, 27 had read them in the BMJ; eight had read them elsewhere or could not recall the source.
CommentThe resuscitation skills of preregistration house officers and candidates for the MRCP examination are poor. 45 The need for practical training and revision has long been recognised. We studied the doctors in cardiac arrest teams, who would be expected to be thoroughly conversant with the new guidelines on advanced life support. It is therefore surprising that less than a third of them could recall the full sequence of management of ventricular fibrillation. Doctors This paper documents the 10 year outcome.
Patients, methods, and resultsWe tried to obtain information about patients who were not currently being followed up in Glasgow by contacting their general practitioner, referring specialist, and the patients themselves, achieving a 10 year follow up in 45 of the 61 patients (74%). We defined cure of hyperprolactinaemia as a plasma prolactin concentration within the reference range (60-360 mU/l), operative failure as a persistently raised prolactin concentration, and recurrence as a sustained increase in prolactin concentration after a normal value had been achieved. In four patients prolactin concentration was variably raised during follow up.The overall results are shown in the figure. Cure rates at 10 years were similar to those at five years (hyperprolactinaemia 73% (95% confidence interval 58% to 85%), amenorrhoea 76% (60% to 87%), galactorrhoea 87% (73% to 95%), and infertility 82% (68% to 92%)).Eleven patients were amenorrhoeic at 10 years: three were menopausal, three had primary operative failure, two had had a hysterectomy (for ovarian cancer and menorrhagia), and three had some evidence of postoperative hypopituitarism. All but eight patients became pregnant. Although infertility was a major indication for operation, four decided postoperatively not to attempt pregnancy despite ach...