2018
DOI: 10.11138/fneur/2018.33.1.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of spasticity with onabotulinumtoxinA: practical guidance based on the italian real-life post-stroke spasticity survey

Abstract: SummaryThe present paper provides practical guidance on the management of adult spasticity with OnabotulinumtoxinA. Advisory Board members reviewed the available evidence and discussed their personal experiences in order to address the unmet needs in the management of spasticity with botulinum toxin type A identified by the recent Italian Real-Life PostStroke Spasticity Survey. Stroke patients should be referred to spasticity services that have adequate facilities and multidisciplinary teams with the necessary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, there are no Delphi-based studies providing insight into expert opinion on these issues. The previous surveys published in 2017 [ 22 ] and 2018 [ 24 ] provided a foundation to this further analysis, which is very specific and concerns well-defined topics: Initiation and follow-up, dosages, and treatment objectives. Although there is high-level evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of BoNT-A in post-stroke spasticity (Grade A), there is little clinical trial-based evidence on how to manage, monitor, reassess, change goals when using BoNT-A for the management of post-stroke spasticity [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To the best of our knowledge, there are no Delphi-based studies providing insight into expert opinion on these issues. The previous surveys published in 2017 [ 22 ] and 2018 [ 24 ] provided a foundation to this further analysis, which is very specific and concerns well-defined topics: Initiation and follow-up, dosages, and treatment objectives. Although there is high-level evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of BoNT-A in post-stroke spasticity (Grade A), there is little clinical trial-based evidence on how to manage, monitor, reassess, change goals when using BoNT-A for the management of post-stroke spasticity [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these findings the expert panel also confirmed that monitoring patients, especially in the first year after stroke, is mandatory. Sandrini et al, in a study published in 2018, support that a post-stroke checklist may allow early detection of post-stroke spasticity, assist in the early management of disability and in rehabilitation planning [ 24 ]. Several predictors of early post-stroke spasticity have been proposed, including increased muscle tone, greater severity of paresis, hypoesthesia, and low Barthel Index score [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In real-world practice, to achieve appropriate clinical and neurorehabilitative goals, the treatment of multifocal spasticity may require doses of BoNT-A that are higher than the recommended regimen [ 12 ]. Thus, depending on the clinical presentation of spasticity in some patients, the cumulative and/or per muscle dose of BoNT-A may be higher than that recommended by the product label [ 13 , 14 ]. Adverse events and antibody development must be considered as potential risks of high-dose BoNT-A therapy [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggressive and appropriate spasticity management contributes to motor re-learning and function recovery during chronic stages [2,6]. Currently, mainstream interventions for upper limb hypertonicity, include stretching, oral antispasticity medications, focal botulinum toxin (BTX) injections and surgical treatment [6][7][8][9]. However, the above treatment methods have drawbacks or are controversial, in terms of their effectiveness and safety [7,[10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%