2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.818760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Spinal Bone Metastases With Radiofrequency Ablation, Vertebral Reinforcement and Transpedicular Fixation: A Retrospective Single-Center Case Series

Abstract: Spine is a frequent site of bone metastases, with a 8.5 months median survival time after diagnosis. In most cases treatment is only palliative. Several advanced techniques can ensure a better Quality of Life (QoL) and increase life expectancy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) uses alternating current to produce local heating and necrosis of the spinal lesion, preserving the healthy bone. RFA is supported by vertebral reinforcement through kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in order to stabilize the fracture with pol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, vertebroplasty usually has a limited role in mechanical support and is not effective in treating unstable spinal metastases that extend to the posterior elements, and posterior instrumentation must be inserted to stabilize the spine due to advanced cancerrelated instability [25]. Giammalva et al studied a combined approach with radiofrequency ablation and vertebroplasty followed by screw fixation, determining it a safe and effective technique for the treatment of metastases to the spine, but with a lower mean VAS pain score at 3 months after the procedure compared to our study (3.35 vs. 0.6) [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…However, vertebroplasty usually has a limited role in mechanical support and is not effective in treating unstable spinal metastases that extend to the posterior elements, and posterior instrumentation must be inserted to stabilize the spine due to advanced cancerrelated instability [25]. Giammalva et al studied a combined approach with radiofrequency ablation and vertebroplasty followed by screw fixation, determining it a safe and effective technique for the treatment of metastases to the spine, but with a lower mean VAS pain score at 3 months after the procedure compared to our study (3.35 vs. 0.6) [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…7 In patients with uncomplicated spine metastases, poor performance status, or limited life expectancy, radiotherapy represents a therapeutic cornerstone, with positive benefit-risk balances compared to surgery or percutaneous ablation. 10,36 Postradiotherapy outcomes vary widely, and postradiation VCFs may occur. Newer SRT protocols and patient-tailored dose planning seem to correlate with improved functional outcomes and LC, 16,29,33 similarly to other lesions benefitting from a stereotactic approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thoracic vertebrae are the most common localization of VBM, accounting for 70% of the cases, followed by lumbosacral (22%) and cervical vertebrae (8%), mainly deriving from hematogenous spreads in the Batson’s vertebral venous plexus. VBM represent a secondary cause of death in the US with a median overall survival after surgery of 8.5 months, with colon, breast, prostate, thyroid, renal cell, lung, and skin cancers as the main primitives [ 2 , 3 ]. Clinical presentation is heterogeneous, with symptoms varying from back pain and functional limitation to metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) with potentially permanent neurological deficit resulting from collapse or fracture of the affected vertebral body [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical presentation is heterogeneous, with symptoms varying from back pain and functional limitation to metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) with potentially permanent neurological deficit resulting from collapse or fracture of the affected vertebral body [ 1 ]. The pathogenesis of back pain in VBM is multifactorial and still the object of debate, resulting from a combination of vertebral body instability, local release from tumor cells of pro-inflammatory cytokines with osteoclast activity augmentation, and involvement of periosteal nerve endings [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation