2009
DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of the critically poisoned patient

Abstract: Background: Clinicians are often challenged to manage critically ill poison patients. The clinical effects encountered in poisoned patients are dependent on numerous variables, such as the dose, the length of exposure time, and the pre-existing health of the patient. The goal of this article is to introduce the basic concepts for evaluation of poisoned patients and review the appropriate management of such patients based on the currently available literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(54 reference statements)
2
46
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…These included all resources required for airway support (endotracheal tubes, oxygen masks, laryngeal masks, nasal catheters and cannulas, and mechanical ventilator), volume expanders (colloids and crystalloids), and cardiac support (electrical defibrillation); breathing support resources were not as common. A review of the published studies indicate that supportive measures including the ''ABC'' (airway, breathing, circulation) are frequently necessary before proof of intoxication [7,10,28]. Intubation is indicated in acute respiratory failure [7,10].…”
Section: Availability Of Stabilization Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These included all resources required for airway support (endotracheal tubes, oxygen masks, laryngeal masks, nasal catheters and cannulas, and mechanical ventilator), volume expanders (colloids and crystalloids), and cardiac support (electrical defibrillation); breathing support resources were not as common. A review of the published studies indicate that supportive measures including the ''ABC'' (airway, breathing, circulation) are frequently necessary before proof of intoxication [7,10,28]. Intubation is indicated in acute respiratory failure [7,10].…”
Section: Availability Of Stabilization Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inducing vomiting for patients poisoned by hydrocarbons can cause aspiration pneumonitis, or providing oxygen to patients with paraquat intoxication might hasten and worsen pulmonary fibrosis) [5,6]. Current recommendations indicate that inducing emesis should not be used routinely after poisoning exposures due to the lack of evidence of improved outcomes and risks including delayed administration of oral antidotes or the reduced effectiveness of activated charcoal, aspiration pneumonitis, and complications from retching and prolonged emesis [7][8][9]. Also, if a poisoning case receives an appropriate treatment but significantly late, the treatment would be ineffective (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…82,80 If the calculated gap is greater than expected, this is taken as evidence of presence of unmeasured negatively charged molecules. Again, there is a wide differential for the possible causes of a raised anion gap acidosis and the clinician must consider them all.…”
Section: -4952-57mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, there is a wide differential for the possible causes of a raised anion gap acidosis and the clinician must consider them all. 1,2,82 A common tool clinicians use to remember the list of causes of a raised anion is the pneumonic MUDPILES which stands for Methanol, Uraemia, Diabetic ketoacidosis, Paraldehyde, Propylene glycol, Iron, Inhalants (carbon monoxide, toluene), Isoniazid, Ibuprofen, Lactic acidosis, Ethylene glycol, Ethanol ketoacidosis, Salicylates, Starvation ketoacidosis, Sympathomimetics.…”
Section: -4952-57mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of GL for patients with oral poisons presenting altered mental status was a standard approach until the 1990s [4]. Now, the guidelines suggest that GL should only be considered in a potentially life-threatening ingestion and then only if it can be undertaken within 60 min of ingestion [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%