2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of the open abdomen using negative pressure wound therapy with instillation in severe abdominal sepsis

Abstract: HighlightsIntra-abdominal sepsis remains one the leading causes of mortality in the SICU .Multiple surgical approaches have been introduced as part of the management of the open abdomen with varying results.Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation in our study population appears as a safe and promising therapeutic option in the context of intraabdominal sepsis.NPWT-I is a therapeutic alternative that showed positive results in our patient group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
2
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
18
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…No data exist in the literature regarding EAF and intraperitoneal FI; some authors, however, agreed that FI has an indirect impact on EAF rate by reducing the OA time and improving the infection resolution [30,32]. The present study did not find significant differences in OA duration linked to FI versus NFI (9 vs. 11 days, respectively), and no statistically significant differences were found in the definitive closure of the abdomen, contrary to what was found in other studies [29,32]. A statistically significant advantage in fascial closure was furthermore identified in FI group, as shown by previous studies [29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…No data exist in the literature regarding EAF and intraperitoneal FI; some authors, however, agreed that FI has an indirect impact on EAF rate by reducing the OA time and improving the infection resolution [30,32]. The present study did not find significant differences in OA duration linked to FI versus NFI (9 vs. 11 days, respectively), and no statistically significant differences were found in the definitive closure of the abdomen, contrary to what was found in other studies [29,32]. A statistically significant advantage in fascial closure was furthermore identified in FI group, as shown by previous studies [29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, V-HOCL was not hazardous to the peritoneum or serosal surfaces of the abdominal organs as a washout solution or irrigant with NPWT-i. This study confirmed the findings and recommendations of Fraser controlled fashion in trauma and general surgery patients using NPWT-i [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recently, there have been an increasing number of reports of OAM with NPWT for traumatic diseases, severe peritonitis, severe pancreatitis and ECF. [18] , [19] It is also thought that OAM with NPWT is useful for chronic cases which the timing of surgical intervention was delayed, such as the present case. In the future, the increased spread of indications of OAM for nontraumatic diseases may lead to favorable postoperative outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%