2016
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of the open abdomen: clinical recommendations for the trauma/acute care surgeon and general surgeon

Abstract: Traditionally, the surgical approach to managing abdominal injuries was to assess the extent of trauma, repair any damage and close the abdomen in one definitive procedure rather than leave the abdomen open. With advances in medicine, damage control surgery using temporary abdominal closure methods is being used to manage the open abdomen (OA) when closure is not possible. Although OA management is often observed in traumatic injuries, the extension of damage control surgery concepts, in conjunction with OA, f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11 Much is published about the closure of the open abdomen; the majority are temporizing procedures that often accept an incisional hernia. 12,13 At our institution, frequent use of the ABRA DTS has resulted in a paradigm shift toward definitive primary myofascial closure. The ABRA DTS provides dynamic tension that facilitates relaxation of the flat muscles, thus allowing for the medialization of the rectus myofascial units utilizing elastomers and anchoring buttons (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Much is published about the closure of the open abdomen; the majority are temporizing procedures that often accept an incisional hernia. 12,13 At our institution, frequent use of the ABRA DTS has resulted in a paradigm shift toward definitive primary myofascial closure. The ABRA DTS provides dynamic tension that facilitates relaxation of the flat muscles, thus allowing for the medialization of the rectus myofascial units utilizing elastomers and anchoring buttons (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the nature of the pathology and surgical lesion, patients who are candidates for open abdomen may require multiple surgical interventions until adequate control and/or definitive resolution of the abdominal index event is achieved. This may be associated with significant complications, including enteroatmospheric fistulas, loss of abdominal wall domain, and large hernias of the abdominal wall 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique ensures appropriate evacuation of ascites rich in pro-inflammatory markers and contamination,69 improves nursing care, and prevents retraction of fascial edges, facilitating early definitive fascial closure (Figure 3). 68,70 Temporary closure in OA without negative pressure can be currently considered only if NPWT is not available (low resource setting), resulting frequently in a delayed fascial closure and increased intestinal fistula rates 67,68Figure 3A clinical image of a patient with aortic injury subjected to damage control laparotomy with temporary abdominal closure using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Note: Photo courtesy of Peep Talving.…”
Section: Management Of Acsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of NPWT has significantly reduced the complication rate as well as nursing workload. Different commercial products for NPWT are available 64,70. The optimal negative pressure has been suggested to be −125 mmHg, with lower level (−70 mmHg) when active bleeding due to coagulopathy is suspected 67.…”
Section: Patient With Open Abdomen In Intensive Carementioning
confidence: 99%