2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47295-9_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of the Power Distribution Network Reconstruction Process Using Fuzzy Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the determination of the exact Pareto optimal front value is computationally prohibitive, the objective is reduced to the determination of an approximate Pareto front such that the distance to the Pareto front is minimised, diversity of the Pareto optimal set is maximised, and existing non‐dominated solutions are maintained . The best trade‐off among candidate solutions, in this paper, is obtained by using the fuzzy multicriteria decision‐making method, described by Bellman and Zadeh and applied in Saric and Hivziefendic . The following equation shows the value of the membership function (MF) for each value from the Pereto optimal set of solution for the case of the objective F j that needs to be minimised: 0.25emμAj()x=minxDxFj()xFj()x, where 0.25emμAj respesents the MF of a candidate solution x , which belongs to the decision set D x .…”
Section: Theoretical Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the determination of the exact Pareto optimal front value is computationally prohibitive, the objective is reduced to the determination of an approximate Pareto front such that the distance to the Pareto front is minimised, diversity of the Pareto optimal set is maximised, and existing non‐dominated solutions are maintained . The best trade‐off among candidate solutions, in this paper, is obtained by using the fuzzy multicriteria decision‐making method, described by Bellman and Zadeh and applied in Saric and Hivziefendic . The following equation shows the value of the membership function (MF) for each value from the Pereto optimal set of solution for the case of the objective F j that needs to be minimised: 0.25emμAj()x=minxDxFj()xFj()x, where 0.25emμAj respesents the MF of a candidate solution x , which belongs to the decision set D x .…”
Section: Theoretical Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A probabilistic approach is difficult to apply to this problem because of the lack of significant data and because uncertainty is not random. In practice, it is not possible to model wide range of practical engineering problems using the exclusive domain of Aristotelian binary logics in which particular element x, either belongs to a set A (A=1) or it does not belong to a set A (A=0), because such a rigid approach to boundary definition between two sets reduces natural process to discrete ones [10]. Probabilistic and deterministic methods model coefficients as crisp values which is not realistic scenario [1] and might lead towards misallocation of resources.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore justified to use new methods and tools, such as fuzzy systems, to create a logical framework, which will use realistic data to model EPDS planning criteria. Some of the examples of fuzzy approach to EPDS and Distributed Generation (DG) planning and development applications are presented in [10], [14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%