2001
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143354.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of unstable angina. Guidelines – 2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed patient eligibility criteria are described elsewhere 1 , 2 , 14 . These indicators were derived from evidence‐based guidelines released in 2000 and 2001, 15 , 16 and modified by consensus of an expert panel of cardiologists and general physicians. Outcome indicators were in‐hospital mortality rate, mean length of hospital stay, and same‐diagnosis readmission rate within 30 days of discharge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed patient eligibility criteria are described elsewhere 1 , 2 , 14 . These indicators were derived from evidence‐based guidelines released in 2000 and 2001, 15 , 16 and modified by consensus of an expert panel of cardiologists and general physicians. Outcome indicators were in‐hospital mortality rate, mean length of hospital stay, and same‐diagnosis readmission rate within 30 days of discharge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1996−7, 12 400 deaths and 156 000 hospitalizations were attributed to ACS in Australia, with an estimated health‐care cost of A$168 million 1 . Since early in the year 2000, evidence‐based clinical practice guidelines relating to the in‐hospital management of these syndromes were produced by professional cardiac societies in Australia and New Zealand 2 and overseas 3,4 . Attempts at developing valid and reliable performance measures for purposes of benchmarking and feedback are currently under way 5…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organised care of patients with stroke is known to improve outcomes, 1 yet only a small proportion of patients receive this care in Australia 2 . Similarly, the publication of national guidelines 3 and academic detailing 4 have had little or no effect on the use of drugs that are known to improve outcomes for patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Multifaceted interventions 5 that change the system of care may be the best way to translate research evidence into best practice 6 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%