2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of unusual missed diagnosis of a Intra-orbital wooden foreign body: A case report and review of literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To supplement this information, we conducted a review of studies published between 2016 and 2022 using PubMed and analyzed the symptoms of 30 patients diagnosed with an IOWFB. Our findings demonstrated the prevalence of the following symptoms: decreased visual acuity (16/27 cases), limited ocular motility (11/23 cases), proptosis (9/18 cases), the elevation of intraocular pressure (11/19 cases), swelling of the eyelids (25/28 cases), conjunctival congestion (11/11), and diplopia (3/3) 1,7,8,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . Although some of these findings are non-specific, limited ocular motility, proptosis, and the elevation of intraocular pressure can be relatively specific findings of intra-orbital diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…To supplement this information, we conducted a review of studies published between 2016 and 2022 using PubMed and analyzed the symptoms of 30 patients diagnosed with an IOWFB. Our findings demonstrated the prevalence of the following symptoms: decreased visual acuity (16/27 cases), limited ocular motility (11/23 cases), proptosis (9/18 cases), the elevation of intraocular pressure (11/19 cases), swelling of the eyelids (25/28 cases), conjunctival congestion (11/11), and diplopia (3/3) 1,7,8,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . Although some of these findings are non-specific, limited ocular motility, proptosis, and the elevation of intraocular pressure can be relatively specific findings of intra-orbital diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…[21][22][23] The available literature is restricted to a handful of retrospective studies involving a limited number of cases. [24][25][26][27] Consequently, thorough examinations of cases with nonmetallic intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) are crucial for advancing comprehension and advancing clinical approaches for diagnosis and treatment in the future. 20 To address these cases effectively, a thorough clinical assessment involving ultrasound and CT scans, along with examinations conducted under general anesthesia, is essential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infection may manifest as orbital cellulitis, abscess formation, and even intracranial infection. Detection of wood in the eye is challenging because it is carbon-containing and not visible on conventional x-ray may not image well on CT or MRI [ 169 , 170 ]. If the chip is small and on the surface, it may be flushed with eyewash; however, deeper penetration shards may require surgical intervention and antibiotic treatment ( Figure 1 ) [ 171 ].…”
Section: Workplace Ocular Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%