1989
DOI: 10.1159/000281509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Ureteral Stones by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

Abstract: From April 1985 to March 1987 181 patients with ureteral stones were treated by means of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Management for proximal calculi changed from in situ ESWL treatment (group n = 27) or placement of a ureteral catheter below calculi (group II, n = 30) to retrograde stone manipulation into renal pelvis (group IV, n = 52) or ESWL treatment under intraoperative irrigation of saline in cases where repositioning failed (group III, n = 50). The best stone-free rate for upper ureter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, some groups advocated a policy of ureteral manipulations that create an expansion chamber to improve disintegration [2,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. They recommended the manipulations of ure teral stenting and below-calculus irrigation through a ure teral catheter for impacted ureteral calculi, whereas others preferred a trial of in situ treatment based on a large series of patients treated effectively without ureteral catheter ization [5-7, 17, 18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some groups advocated a policy of ureteral manipulations that create an expansion chamber to improve disintegration [2,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. They recommended the manipulations of ure teral stenting and below-calculus irrigation through a ure teral catheter for impacted ureteral calculi, whereas others preferred a trial of in situ treatment based on a large series of patients treated effectively without ureteral catheter ization [5-7, 17, 18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%