1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(98)70049-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of vasodilatory shock after cardiac surgery: Identification of predisposing factors and use of a novel pressor agent

Abstract: Low ejection fraction and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use are risk factors for postbypass vasodilatory shock, and this syndrome is associated with vasopressin deficiency. In patients exhibiting this syndrome after high-risk cardiac operations, replacement of arginine vasopressin increases blood pressure and reduces catecholamine pressor requirements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
225
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 341 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
225
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Observing the other 55 studies we can find: 1) one study (1.67%) based on evidences through metanalysis of literature [13]; 2) seven review articles (11.67%) [4,14,23]. The other bibliographical citations in number of 44 (73.33%) are distributed as case reports (great majority) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], letters [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], technical aspects of the MB use [45][46][47][48][49][50] and other studies involving risk [51,52], the VS incidence in the "off pump" CABG and the possibility of MB use in anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock [53], also a proposal of the author of this text ( Figure 4) [54][55][56][57][58]. The presented numbers, surely, are not totally compatible with the total of publications, but it is possible to assume that this imprecision does not affect the general vision of the problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observing the other 55 studies we can find: 1) one study (1.67%) based on evidences through metanalysis of literature [13]; 2) seven review articles (11.67%) [4,14,23]. The other bibliographical citations in number of 44 (73.33%) are distributed as case reports (great majority) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], letters [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], technical aspects of the MB use [45][46][47][48][49][50] and other studies involving risk [51,52], the VS incidence in the "off pump" CABG and the possibility of MB use in anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock [53], also a proposal of the author of this text ( Figure 4) [54][55][56][57][58]. The presented numbers, surely, are not totally compatible with the total of publications, but it is possible to assume that this imprecision does not affect the general vision of the problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a change regarding the paradigm that inflammatory reaction associated with VS would be caused by blood exposure to the non-endothelial surface of the ECC, after it was verified that the inflammatory response is present in off-pump patients [54]. A change tendency is observed in the concept that, more than the contact with the CPB circuit, the contact of the blood with the wound EVORA, PRB ET AL -Methylene blue for vasoplegic syndrome treatment in heart surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 In this case, we report the use of vasopressin in the treatment of acute distributive shock that occurred during the administration of aprotinin in a patient undergoing repeat cardiac surgery.…”
Section: Conclusion : La Vasopressine Associée à Des Alpha-agonistesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASOPRESSIN has been recommended recently for the treatment of ventricular fibrillation, septic shock, 1,2 and post-cardiopulmonary bypass distributive shock. 3,4 In this case, we report the use of vasopressin in the treatment of acute distributive shock that occurred during the administration of aprotinin in a patient undergoing repeat cardiac surgery. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 70 mm Hg, systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) < 1400 dyn/s/cm 5 /m 2 , systemic vascular resistance (SVR) < 400 dyn/s/ cm 5 ; cardiac index (CI) > 2.5 l/min/m 2 , central venous pressure (CVP) > 10 mm Hg, and time coincidence: the presence of clinical symptoms 2-12 h after the end of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) [1][2][3][4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%