Management research outcome: a comparative assessment of BRICS nations

Upadhyaya, Pallavi; Pillai, K R

doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1455083

Cited by 6 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A common theme involves thinking about impact during the processes of undertaking the research itself as opposed to afterwards (Doyle, 2018;Woolcott et al, 2020). Such engagement includes: situated, relational and ongoing interactions and creating space for generative dialogue (Johnson & Orr, 2020), broadening participation, initiating consortia, building impact evaluation groups, mentoring (e.g., Haley et al, 2017), promoting engaged scholarship (see Van de Ven &Johnson, 2006), dialogue, praxis, andreflexivity (MacIntosh et al, 2017), sabbaticals in business practice (Aguinis et al, 2014, p. 627) and more 'Mode 2' research (Gibbons et al, 1994), all of which should be carried out over long time periods (Upadhyaya & Pillai, 2019). These academic-practitioner engagement activities underpin the view that 'impact is a process, not (solely) an outcome' (MacIntosh et al, 2017;Perkmann et al, 2013) and reflect a perspective that impact is the process by which research makes a difference, rather than the product of having made a difference (Doyle, 2018).…”

Section: Higher Education and The Research Impact Agendamentioning

confidence: 99%

Where does all the ‘know how’ go? The role of tacit knowledge in research impact

Mitchell

Harvey

Wood

2021

Higher Education Research & Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Higher Education Institutions are increasingly called upon to demonstrate their real world impact, which, in many instances, remains elusive. We believe this is partly due to the undercounting and under-estimation of the importance of tacit knowledge by researchers and regulators. We propose this as a missing contingency in the research-impact relationship. To better acknowledge and utilize tacit research knowledge in the impact process, we emphasize processes of praxis, reflexivity and dialogical sense-making, which help externalize implicit tacit knowledge, and socialization processes, which facilitate enactment, emulation and feedback to develop inherent tacit knowledge. Examples from management research are used to exemplify these processes. The implications of accepting the importance of tacit knowledge in creating impact call for changes in how researchers, universities, funders, assessors and governments, fund, create and assess real world research impact.

show abstract

Section: Higher Education and The Research Impact Agendamentioning

confidence: 99%

Where does all the ‘know how’ go? The role of tacit knowledge in research impact

Mitchell

Harvey

Wood

2021

Higher Education Research & Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A lo largo de la historia, las universidades se han caracterizado por desplegar, en un mayor o menor grado, actividades de investigación como aporte al desarrollo social y económico, lo que ha generado la necesidad de dotarse de condiciones, institucionales e individuales, suficientes que les permitan generar conocimiento pertinente en un mundo globalizado y cada vez más competitivo (Upadhyaya y Rajasekharan, 2019).…”

Section: Revisión Bibliográficaunclassified

Caracterización del profesorado con perfil investigador en universidades colombianas

Naffah

Gómez

2020

Rev. Electr. Educare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Las dinámicas de producción de conocimiento, derivadas de la actividad científica realizada en las instituciones de educación superior, han sido un fenómeno ampliamente estudiado desde mediados del siglo XX. En Colombia, el análisis de las capacidades que desarrollan las universidades para la investigación ha cobrado importancia en los últimos treinta años como consecuencia de la intención de fortalecer su sistema nacional de ciencia, tecnología e innovación, liderado por el Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. Este trabajo presenta una caracterización del profesorado con perfil investigador (condiciones institucionales y factores individuales) vinculados a universidades colombianas. Mediante un estudio cuantitativo, no experimental, desarrollado en 2018, se aplicó un cuestionario autoadministrado a una muestra representativa de 379 docentes con perfil investigador, líderes de grupos de investigación, adscritos a diferentes universidades del país. El análisis de datos se realizó por medio de pruebas no paramétricas H Kruskal Wallis y U de Mann Whitney. Se encontró que algunas variables como el área disciplinar de formación del profesorado, el tipo de vinculación laboral a la universidad y las concepciones de la investigación que tiene están asociadas al tipo de crecimiento de la productividad científica que muestran las universidades. En este sentido, el estudio aporta evidencia empírica, tanto en las condiciones institucionales (estructura organizacional para la investigación y prácticas de gestión de la investigación) como en factores individuales, que explica la existencia de las diferencias en el desarrollo y consolidación de las dinámicas de producción científica en las universidades colombianas.

show abstract

“…Research can also be a stepping stone for the country’s development (Upadhyaya & Rajasekharan Pillai, 2019) and it plays an important role in promoting the economic wealth of a country and the welfare of its citizens (Okiki, 2013). This is supported by the direct, indirect, and flow-on impact of research leading to the addition of value-added, production capacity (technology) and consumer surplus (Deloitte Access Economics, 2015).…”

Section: Introduction and The Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Third, we looked at the entire set of economic impact metrics contained in SciVal. The economic impact on the previous research performance examination conducted by Upadhyaya and Rajasekharan Pillai (2019) in the BRICS country only includes the patent citation variable per scholarly output. Finally, we added the publication conversion rate analysis to the number of patents that was ignored in the previous studies.…”

Section: Introduction and The Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At the ASEAN level, several similar studies have focused on particular subjects such as energy and fuel (Sombatsompop et al, 2011), education and psychology (Guido & Orleans, 2020; Vinluan, 2012), library science (Ibrahim et al, 2021; Ramos-Eclevia et al, 2018), and the economy (Kumar et al, 2014). Upadhyaya and Rajasekharan Pillai (2019) conducted research productivity in the BRICS country. This study expands the scope into research productivity at the country level in the ASEAN by looking at all of the subjects’ performance, in particular the subjects that have not been available in the previous research.…”

Section: Introduction and The Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative Study of ASEAN Research Productivity

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research productivity has become one of the main indicators used by higher education institutions (HEIs) as well as the country to support their innovation capability. This study purposely describes the research productivity among ASEAN countries, which is considered to be the world’s current economic hotspot. By using SciVal database to examine the literature over the last 10 years, we describe productivity, citation impact, and economic impact metrics. The findings indicate that Singapore is superior in terms of publication quality (citation) and patents while Malaysia is leading in terms of the number of scientific research. Interestingly, Indonesia’s scientific publication growth has the highest percentage. Furthermore, Engineering & Technology and Life Sciences & Medicine are the two major contributors to ASEAN research productivity. These subjects could be the major locomotives for ASEAN countries to use to sustain their competitiveness if the leaders can transform it into successful commercialization.

show abstract

Management research outcome: a comparative assessment of BRICS nations

Cited by 6 publications

References 33 publications

Where does all the ‘know how’ go? The role of tacit knowledge in research impact

Where does all the ‘know how’ go? The role of tacit knowledge in research impact

Caracterización del profesorado con perfil investigador en universidades colombianas

Comparative Study of ASEAN Research Productivity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About