2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.465-466.1155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management Systems Integration for Organizational Sustainability: Quality, Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety, and Energy

Abstract: This paper identifies the trends in existing literatures on management system standards such as Quality (Q), Environmental (E), Occupational Health and Safety (OHS), and Energy (En) Management System (MS). Literatures related to these management system standards (MSSs) and its integrations published between year 1980 to 2012 have been critically analyzed. It provides a general overview of the Integrated Management System (IMS) implementation and the composition of MSSs in developing IMS in various organization… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mohamad et al [78] studying management system integration for organizational sustainability, identifies the following CSFs: "management commitment and leadership, resources management, focuses on stakeholders, education and training, performance measurement, systems and processes and continual improvement" (p. 1158). Almeida et al [79] in exploring CSFs of the IMS, also focusing on both difficulties faced by firms in their implementation and resulting benefits, found that the key CSFs in this domain are top management involvement, human and financial resources availability and employee training.…”
Section: Csfs Of Integrated Management Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohamad et al [78] studying management system integration for organizational sustainability, identifies the following CSFs: "management commitment and leadership, resources management, focuses on stakeholders, education and training, performance measurement, systems and processes and continual improvement" (p. 1158). Almeida et al [79] in exploring CSFs of the IMS, also focusing on both difficulties faced by firms in their implementation and resulting benefits, found that the key CSFs in this domain are top management involvement, human and financial resources availability and employee training.…”
Section: Csfs Of Integrated Management Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This goal of integrating management systems for quality, environment, health and safety and social responsibility is well established in the literature (Almeida et al, 2014;Kymal et al, 2015;Mohamad F. et al, 2013). In practice, process owners must work with cross-functional teams to ensure that the organizational processes are capable of meeting the requirements defined by the various standards and strategic goals to create the intended shared value (Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Stage 4: Systems Integration To Execute the Shared Value Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models to integrate MSs were proposed, among others, by Karapetrovic and Willborn ( 1998 ), Renfrew and Muir ( 1998 ) and Zeng, Shi, and Lou ( 2007 ) and the specifi cs of the audit function were dissected by Beckmerhagen et al ( 2003b ), Bernardo, Casadesús, and Heras ( 2009), Domingues, Sampaio, and Arezes ( 2011, 2014a and Kraus and Grosskopf ( 2008 ). Recently some lessons learned from integrated management abandonment cases were listed (Gianni & Gotzamani, 2015 ), the relationship within safety and quality MSs was pointed out (Karanikas, 2014 ) and MSs integration as a pillar for organisational sustainability was discussed by Mohamad, Abdulllah, Mohammad, and Kamaruddin ( 2014 ). Although a large stream of bibliography is available not a great deal of them, if any, concerns with the assessment of the IMS, its features and the level of articulation between its different components.…”
Section: Lack Of Scientifi C Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An IMS implementation refl ects the commitment by the top management with the requirements by several stakeholders, and so, with the requirements by people and entities that in some way interact with the company at different levels. This feature provides top management with a wider vision concerning the company position among society, enabling the identifi cation and assessment of variables infl uencing the management component (Mohamad et al, 2014 ;Rebelo, Santos, & Silva, 2014 ). Accordingly, a company addressing the sustainability concept evidences a higher maturity level if compared with other company that do not address to this concept.…”
Section: Final Front Offi Ce Component Incorporating Externalities Anmentioning
confidence: 99%