2016
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2016.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management Theory and Social Welfare: Contributions and Challenges

Abstract: Co-Editors, Special Topic Forum on Management Theory and Social Welfare]1 Some of Professor Jones's contribution to this essay was derived from unpublished work done jointly with Professor Will Felps (University of New South Wales) whose efforts are gratefully acknowledged. 2 Lynn Stout, originally a co-editor, also made contributions to this Special Topic Forum. Judith Edwards contributed several editorial refinements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of this research, however, has focused on the economic side (Jones et al, 2016), thereby neglecting the humanistic model of man and the social roots of organizational scholarship. Stewardship theory considers this humanistic side, portraying individuals as stewards, intrinsically motivated to put the interests of the organization and stakeholders ahead of self-serving interests (Davis et al, 1997).…”
Section: Central Tenets Of Stewardship Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of this research, however, has focused on the economic side (Jones et al, 2016), thereby neglecting the humanistic model of man and the social roots of organizational scholarship. Stewardship theory considers this humanistic side, portraying individuals as stewards, intrinsically motivated to put the interests of the organization and stakeholders ahead of self-serving interests (Davis et al, 1997).…”
Section: Central Tenets Of Stewardship Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What we need is a theory of how and why certain types of governance arrangements-that is, the institutional structure of private and public organizations and the collaborations among them-arise to govern the constellations of capabilities and resources necessary to create value both for the organizations and for social welfare in a broader sense. Developing such a framework is complicated by the fact that public organizations are as varied and complex as private ones and that public organizations serve people with different preferences and perceptions of the goals to be pursued, and the nature of expected performance (Jones et al, 2016;Klein, Mahoney, McGahan, & Pitelis, 2013;Williamson, 1999). For public organizations, multitask principal/agent relations further complicate effective value creation and mission accomplishment (Holmstrom & Milgrom, 1991;Klein, Mahoney, McGahan, & Pitelis, 2010;Makadok & Coff, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As powerful economic institutions, organizations are increasingly being called on to address issues that help advance social welfare, such as the environment, health care, and poverty (Golden-Biddle & Dutton, 2012;Jones et al, 2016;Walsh, Weber, & Margolis, 2003). Organizations have the opportunity-some might even say the obligation (Donaldson, 1982;Hinings & Greenwood, 2002)-to supplement traditional roles once served by governments and address pressing social issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%