2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0982-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managerial Abilities: Evidence from Religious Mutual Fund Managers

Abstract: In this study, we analyze the financial performance and the managerial abilities of religious mutual fund managers, implementing a comparative analysis with conventional mutual funds. We use a broad sample, free of survivorship bias, of religious equity mutual funds from the US market, for the period from January 1994 to September 2010. We build a matched-pair conventional sample in order to compare the results obtained for both kinds of mutual fund managers. We analyze stock-picking and market timing abilitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation to the investment styles, conventional and SR pension funds usually invest in small caps (significantly positive β 2 ) and growth stocks (significantly negative β 3 ). Similar results are found by Ferruz et al (2012) in a US mutual fund sample, in which religious mutual funds usually invest in small caps. Moreover, both pension funds develop contrarian momentum strategies (significantly negative β 4 ).…”
Section: Performance Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In relation to the investment styles, conventional and SR pension funds usually invest in small caps (significantly positive β 2 ) and growth stocks (significantly negative β 3 ). Similar results are found by Ferruz et al (2012) in a US mutual fund sample, in which religious mutual funds usually invest in small caps. Moreover, both pension funds develop contrarian momentum strategies (significantly negative β 4 ).…”
Section: Performance Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Some of the most recent papers about financial performance of SR mutual funds have implemented this methodology (Bauer et al 2005;Bauer et al 2006;Bauer et al 2007;Kempf and Osthoff 2007;Climent and Soriano 2011;Ferruz et al 2012):…”
Section: Performance Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these proxies of comparable returns are attributed to the similar level of market risk they both expose across the total period. This result differs from that of Luis et al, (2012) who add that religious mutual fund managers underperform their conventional counterparts.…”
Section: Significance Of Differences Between Cmfs and Imfs Performancescontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Although the issue of market timing abilities of mutual fund managers has been extensively explored in the finance literature, there are only a few studies that address managers' timing abilities with respect to their investment styles or market segments (e.g., Chan, Chen, & Lakonishok, 2002;Daniel, Grinblatt, Titman, & Wermers, 1997;Glassman & Riddick, 2006). In the SRI context, this evidence is scarce and, to the best of our knowledge, limited to the studies of Ferruz, Muñoz, and Vargas (2012) and Muñoz, Vicente, and Ferruz (2015) on US funds and Muñoz et al (2014) on green mutual funds. Ferruz et al (2012) show that religious mutual funds underperform conventional funds not only in terms of their stock-picking abilities, but also because they cannot time any investment style, unlike their conventional peers, which show positive ability to time the size and book-to-market styles.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SRI context, this evidence is scarce and, to the best of our knowledge, limited to the studies of Ferruz, Muñoz, and Vargas (2012) and Muñoz, Vicente, and Ferruz (2015) on US funds and Muñoz et al (2014) on green mutual funds. Ferruz et al (2012) show that religious mutual funds underperform conventional funds not only in terms of their stock-picking abilities, but also because they cannot time any investment style, unlike their conventional peers, which show positive ability to time the size and book-to-market styles. In turn, Muñoz et al (2015) find little differences between US SRI and conventional mutual fund managers, with both groups exhibiting negative selectivity abilities, positive size and bookto-market timing skills and an inability to time the market or the momentum factor.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%