Managerial and Customer Costs of Price Adjustment: Direct Evidence from Industrial Markets

Abstract

Abstract-We study the price adjustment practices and provide quantitative measurement of the managerial and customer costs of price adjustment using data from a large U.S. industrial manufacturer and its customers. We nd that price adjustment costs are a much more complex construct than the existing industrial-organization or macroeconomics literature recognizes. In addition to physical costs (menu costs), we identify and measure three types of managerial costs (information gathering, decision-making, and communication costs) and two types of customer costs (communication and negotiation costs). We nd that the managerial costs are more than 6 times, and customer costs are more than 20 times, the menu costs. In total, the price adjustment costs comprise 1.22% of the company's revenue and 20.03% of the company's net margin. We show that many components of the managerial and customer costs are convex, whereas the menu costs are not. We also document the link between price adjustment costs and price rigidity. Finally, we provide evidence of managers' fear of antagonizing customers.I have no answer to the question of how to measure these menu change costs, but these [menu cost] theories will never be taken seriously until an answer is provided.Edward Prescott (1987, p. 113) Given the large number of theoretical papers that evaluate the implications of [price] adjustment costs, obtaining direct evidence that such costs are present seems crucial.Margaret Slade (1998, p. 104)

Delegation of pricing authority to the sales force: An agency-theoretic perspective of its determinants and impact on performance

“…This effect could occur because with greater customer heterogeneity there is greater potential for charges of price discrimination and customer antagonization if salespeople are given authority to vary the price according to their special knowledge of customers' characteristics. If central managers feel the costs of dealing with these charges or, more broadly, 'customer antagonization costs' (see, e.g., Blinder, Canetti, Lebow, & Rudd, 1998;Rotemberg, 2005;Zbaracki, Ritson, Levy, Dutta, & Bergen, 2004) outweigh the benefits of price customization, then they may restrict the pricing authority of salespeople as customer heterogeneity increases. (Rotemberg's, 2005 model in fact shows how the threat of consumers' angry reactions over unfair price increases can lead to price rigidity.…”

“…Again, this could be because the customer costs of pricing adjustments can be substantial and increase with their frequency (e.g., Zbaracki et al, 2004). Further, the frequency of adjustments is likely to be higher in more volatile sales environments.…”

Innovation in Marketing Channels

“…According to Zbaracki et al (2004), ESL systems are costly to purchase (system price, installation cost, training to employees to use the system) and maintain (continuous upgrade of software and hardware, labels battery replacement, labels replacement after tampering).…”

Wage or price-based inflation? Alternative targets in optimal monetary policy rules

“…Empirically observed large inertial patterns can be interpreted as the results of information gluts: the presence of a high level of heterogeneity in both the labor and goods markets makes the process of discovering the general price level a non-trivial task from the perspective of a single agent. The large amount of information to be processed within a limited amount of time is a source of stickiness, either in price or in wages or in both, as outlined by Zbaracki et al (2004). If we accept this interpretation, the assumption of the quadratic cost of price and wage adjustment costs becomes more appealing, rather than alternative methods of modelling rigidities, because of the explicit dependence of costs on the economic context, instead of modelling the deterministic fixed cost of changing prices and/or wages.…”