2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managerial incentives and risk-taking☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

184
2,154
23
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,456 publications
(2,372 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
184
2,154
23
11
Order By: Relevance
“…shareholders in corporate risk taking has received only limited attention in the empirical literature, unlike managerial ownership (Denis et al (1997)), CEO pay-performance sensitivity (Coles et al (2006)) and legal protection of investors (John et al (2008)). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shareholders in corporate risk taking has received only limited attention in the empirical literature, unlike managerial ownership (Denis et al (1997)), CEO pay-performance sensitivity (Coles et al (2006)) and legal protection of investors (John et al (2008)). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some researchers choose the acquisition propensity as the proxy of risk-taking behavior [7,26]. R&D expenditure is also a common proxy as the measurement of corporate risk-taking [8,27]. In addition, Li & Tang (2010) and Greve (2003) utilize the activity of launching innovative products as the risk-taking proxy and predict the impact of CEO hubris on firm risk taking in the context of China [2,28].…”
Section: Prior Literature Corporate Risk-taking Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Guay (1999) and Guay (1999, 2002), we use the sensitivity of CEO's stock and option values to changes in stock price (delta) and the sensitivity of CEO's stock and option values to changes in stock return volatility (vega) as measures for incentives provided by managerial compensation and ownership. Based on these measures, Coles, Daniel and Naveen (2006) find that higher vega leads to more risk-taking activities by management, such as lower investment in property, plant, and equipment, higher book leverage, and market leverage. In contrast, higher delta leads to less risky financial policies such as a decrease in leverage and an increase in capital expenditures.…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%