2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02196.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managerial Ownership and Accounting Conservatism in Japan: A Test of Management Entrenchment Effect

Abstract: We examine the effect of managerial ownership on the demand for accounting conservatism in Japan. We find that within the low and high levels of managerial ownership, managerial ownership is significantly negatively related to the asymmetric timeliness of earnings, which is consistent with the implication of the incentive alignment effect. We also find a significant positive relationship between managerial ownership and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings for the intermediate levels of managerial ownership, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(190 reference statements)
5
53
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For our sample, the mean (median) percentage of MO is 0.007 (0.001), which exhibits fair skewness distribution. This value is lower than that of prior studies that have examined the MO of Japanese firms (Shuto & Takada, 2010;Teshima, 2004;Teshima & Shuto, 2008). In our opinion, the lower value arises from the fact that our sample is restricted to firms that issue corporate bonds.…”
Section: Sample Selectioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…For our sample, the mean (median) percentage of MO is 0.007 (0.001), which exhibits fair skewness distribution. This value is lower than that of prior studies that have examined the MO of Japanese firms (Shuto & Takada, 2010;Teshima, 2004;Teshima & Shuto, 2008). In our opinion, the lower value arises from the fact that our sample is restricted to firms that issue corporate bonds.…”
Section: Sample Selectioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…The model explained 29.2% of the variation in the accrual conservatism (Adjusted R 2 = 29.2%). This adjusted R 2 is higher that the R 2 that reported by Shuto and Takada (2010) and Ahmed and Duellman (2007) at 14% and 12.96% respectively. The following section provides the results of the relationship among the variables under study as hypothesised previously.…”
Section: Hypotheses Testingcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“… In recent years, a number of papers have examined conditional conservatism in an international context. Papers include Giner and Rees (2001), Raonic et al (2004), Lara et al (2005), Dargenidou et al (2007), Jenkins et al (2009), Lara et al (2009) and Shuto and Takada (2010). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%