Managerial Political Behavior in Innovation Portfolio Management: A Sensegiving and Sensebreaking Process

Abstract

By applying formalized innovation portfolio management systems, firms seek to ensure an alignment of their goals and strategy with their employees' different abilities, actions, and outcomes. However, research indicates that nonrational, political behavior also determines formalized innovation portfolio management decision‐making processes. Research on political behavior in respect of innovation portfolio management usually conceptualizes political behavior as a set of self‐serving activities, such as negotiation, bargaining, coalition building, and acquiring power, aimed at protecting, maintaining, or promoting an actor's self‐interest and power. Consequently, extant research tends to focus on political behavior's dysfunctional impacts on decision‐making processes and their subsequent outcomes. This paper challenges this negativity bias by exploring a novel, neutral specification of political behavior and its relation to innovation portfolio management decision‐making processes. By conducting an automotive industry case study focusing on the innovation portfolio management decision‐making processes, the paper analyzed the data from 43 interviewees. The conceptual model shows that managers' political capabilities determine their ability to behave politically. According to the results, political behavior comprises the activities that prepare the stage and orchestrate others in order to form a political coalition. Furthermore, results show that political behavior functions as a sensegiving and a sensebreaking process, with managers seeking to shape an innovation project's understanding according to their interests and to influence portfolio decisions. The resulting novel specification of political behavior extends the construct's scope and validity by investigating their functional and dysfunctional aspects, and by indicating that a political sensemaking process complements formalized innovation portfolio management decision‐making processes.

Technological Frames in the Digital Age: Theory, Measurement Instrument, and Future Research Areas

“…Within corporate boundaries, researchers can utilize this study’s results to investigate how similarities and differences among technological frames affect their collective aggregation and emergence (see Felin et al, 2015). Future research can extend qualitative insights into specific behaviours, such as framing, political behaviour, and resistance (Hoppmann et al, 2020; Roeth et al, 2019; Young et al, 2016), and explore how these behaviours shape the development of collective technological frames (Azad and Faraj, 2008). Future research can also incorporate insights into the characteristics of technological frames, such as their content, structure, and salience in order to understand the interrelation between the organizational and industrial context and technological frames (Hoppmann et al, 2020; Kaplan and Tripsas, 2008).…”

How Collaborating with NGOs Makes Green Innovations More Desirable

“…Talk–walk disconnect can create internal tensions, such as employees failing to identify with the aspirational talk and not becoming involved in activities to close the gap between the company’s talk and its walk (Scandelius & Cohen, 2016; Winkler et al, 2019). Such tensions might result in internal political battles within a company in which actors use their power and resources to win the battle (Pfeffer, 1981; Roeth et al, 2019). Consumers and their reactions to talk–walk disconnect can help or hinder the position of internal actors who would like to see the walk follow the talk (Brattström & Faems, 2020; Bunduchi, 2017).…”

Strategic and cultural contexts of real options reasoning in innovation portfolios

“…A firm's innovation portfolio embodies its innovative activities (Kock et al, 2015; Salomo et al, 2008) and comprises its collection of currently running innovation projects that share the same resources (Kester et al, 2014; Roeth et al, 2019). Innovation portfolio management aims to foster conditions that facilitate the generation of creative ideas, establish processes to further evaluate these ideas, and align new idea initiatives with a firm's strategic future business (Kock et al, 2015; Unger et al, 2012).…”