Managers, modelers, and measuring the impact of species distribution model uncertainty on marine zoning decisions

Abstract

Marine managers routinely use spatial data to make decisions about their marine environment. Uncertainty associated with this spatial data can have profound impacts on these management decisions and their projected outcomes. Recent advances in modeling techniques, including species distribution models (SDMs), make it easier to generate continuous maps showing the uncertainty associated with spatial predictions and maps. However, SDM predictions and maps can be complex and nuanced. This complexity makes their use challenging for non-technical managers, preventing them from having the best available information to make decisions. To help bridge these communication and information gaps, we developed maps to illustrate how SDMs and associated uncertainty can be translated into readily usable products for managers. We also explicitly described the potential impacts of uncertainty on marine zoning decisions. This approach was applied to a case study in Saipan Lagoon, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). Managers in Saipan are interested in minimizing the potential impacts of personal watercraft (e.g., jet skis) on staghorn Acropora (i.e., Acropora aspera, A. formosa, and A. pulchra), which is an important coral assemblage in the lagoon. We used a recently completed SDM for staghorn Acropora to develop maps showing the sensitivity of zoning options to three different prediction and three different uncertainty thresholds (nine combinations total). Our analysis showed that the amount of area and geographic location of predicted staghorn Acropora presence changed based on these nine combinations. These dramatically different spatial patterns would have significant zoning implications when considering where to exclude and/or allow jet skis operations inside the lagoon. They also show that different uncertainty thresholds may lead managers to markedly different conclusions and courses of action. Defining acceptable levels of uncertainty upfront is critical for ensuring that managers can make more informed decisions, meet their marine resource goals and generate favorable outcomes for their stakeholders.

The conservation of migratory fishes in the second largest river basin of South America depends on the creation of new protected areas

“…New research is continually improving the understanding of the responses of species to climate change, but this knowledge can often be inadequate because the predictions of future impacts are fraught with uncertainty (Pearson, 2006). It is crucial that the uncertainty associated with predicted species distribution data is summarized and visualized in order to guide conservation plans (Wilson, 2010; Guisan et al, 2013; Costa, Kendall & McKagan, 2018). In this study, the variance arising from ENMs was identified as the main cause of distortion in the predictions; thus, the choice for a specific ENM in modelling decisions markedly contributes more to bias than the choice of climate models or emission scenarios.…”

changeRangeR: An R package for reproducible biodiversity change metrics from species distribution estimates

“…They even have potential to inform new proposed workflows for the IUCN Green Status of Species, which measures the success of a species conservation plan and the potential for recovery (Grace et al, 2021). Because of this, uncertainty related to SDMs should be better communicated to decision makers in a meaningful and informative way (Costa et al, 2018).…”