2017
DOI: 10.1353/ras.2017.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Agency Capitalism and Malayan Rubber: Harrisons & Crosfield, Ltd. (1900–1940)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By becoming agents of their industrial companies, entrepreneurs could easily authorize, in self‐signed up agency contracts, their permanent agency tenure and lucrative agency commissions usually settled on 3% to 5% of the sales except Tata who adopted 10% of profits and paid monthly in cash as a first priority. British company law (1856) gave company directors unrestricted authority to appoint management officers, including the “agents” and to offer them powers, remuneration, and tenure “as far as the directors may think fit” (Koike , pp. 77–78).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By becoming agents of their industrial companies, entrepreneurs could easily authorize, in self‐signed up agency contracts, their permanent agency tenure and lucrative agency commissions usually settled on 3% to 5% of the sales except Tata who adopted 10% of profits and paid monthly in cash as a first priority. British company law (1856) gave company directors unrestricted authority to appoint management officers, including the “agents” and to offer them powers, remuneration, and tenure “as far as the directors may think fit” (Koike , pp. 77–78).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%