2022
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing argatroban in heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: A retrospective analysis of 729 treatment days in 32 patients with confirmed heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9][10][11] Marchetti and colleagues (senior author, Prof. Lorenzo Alberio) have performed a detailed analysis of 32 patients with HIT managed at Lausanne University Hospital (Switzerland) during a 4½-year period ending February 2019. 12 HIT diagnosis was secure based upon positive testing by two immunoassays and a positive heparin-induced platelet aggregation test; moreover, 15/32 (46.9%) patients presented with complicating thrombosis, consistent with expected HIT thrombosis rates. 1,2 These authors examined such issues as: initial argatroban dosing; magnitude of dosing adjustments; dosing adjustments with different types of liver dysfunction (hepatocellular, hepatobiliary, both); timing of blood sampling for monitoring after initiating argatroban and following subsequent dose adjustments; type of monitoring (APTT versus thrombin time versus commercial plasma argatroban level); and target international normalized ratio (INR) during argatroban/vitamin K antagonist (VKA) overlap (as argatroban substantially raises INR levels 4 ), among others.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9][10][11] Marchetti and colleagues (senior author, Prof. Lorenzo Alberio) have performed a detailed analysis of 32 patients with HIT managed at Lausanne University Hospital (Switzerland) during a 4½-year period ending February 2019. 12 HIT diagnosis was secure based upon positive testing by two immunoassays and a positive heparin-induced platelet aggregation test; moreover, 15/32 (46.9%) patients presented with complicating thrombosis, consistent with expected HIT thrombosis rates. 1,2 These authors examined such issues as: initial argatroban dosing; magnitude of dosing adjustments; dosing adjustments with different types of liver dysfunction (hepatocellular, hepatobiliary, both); timing of blood sampling for monitoring after initiating argatroban and following subsequent dose adjustments; type of monitoring (APTT versus thrombin time versus commercial plasma argatroban level); and target international normalized ratio (INR) during argatroban/vitamin K antagonist (VKA) overlap (as argatroban substantially raises INR levels 4 ), among others.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Marchetti and colleagues (senior author, Prof. Lorenzo Alberio) have performed a detailed analysis of 32 patients with HIT managed at Lausanne University Hospital (Switzerland) during a 4½‐year period ending February 2019 12 . HIT diagnosis was secure based upon positive testing by two immunoassays and a positive heparin‐induced platelet aggregation test; moreover, 15/32 (46.9%) patients presented with complicating thrombosis, consistent with expected HIT thrombosis rates 1,2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“… 1 Consequently, it is essential to have a rapid and accurate diagnostic approach 4 to guide clinical management of patients with suspected HIT and accurately identify those who will need to be switched to non‐heparin anticoagulants, such as argatroban or danaparoid. 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 We have recently published our original Lausanne algorithm, 17 which is based on the Bayesian use of the 4T score 5 and two sequential rapid IA (CLIA and PaGIA) for anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies. This algorithm is able to accurately predict or exclude HIT in more than 95% of patients evaluated for suspected HIT, with a laboratory turnaround time of ≤1 h. 4 , 17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While unrecognized HIT is linked with high morbidity and mortality, alternative non‐heparin anticoagulants are expensive and associated with a high bleeding rate 1 . Consequently, it is essential to have a rapid and accurate diagnostic approach 4 to guide clinical management of patients with suspected HIT and accurately identify those who will need to be switched to non‐heparin anticoagulants, such as argatroban or danaparoid 24–27 . We have recently published our original Lausanne algorithm, 17 which is based on the Bayesian use of the 4T score 5 and two sequential rapid IA (CLIA and PaGIA) for anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation