2013 IEEE 27th International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2013.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Asynchronous Operations in Coarray Fortran 2.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An implementation of the lifeline algorithm in Co-Array Fortran achieved 58% efficiency at 8,192 cores [Mellor-Crummey et al 2011]. A more recent UTS code using CAF 2.0 finish construct achieves a 74% parallel efficiency on 32,768 Jaguar cores [Yang et al 2013]. In comparison, our code reaches 98% parallel efficiency with 55,680 Power7 cores.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…An implementation of the lifeline algorithm in Co-Array Fortran achieved 58% efficiency at 8,192 cores [Mellor-Crummey et al 2011]. A more recent UTS code using CAF 2.0 finish construct achieves a 74% parallel efficiency on 32,768 Jaguar cores [Yang et al 2013]. In comparison, our code reaches 98% parallel efficiency with 55,680 Power7 cores.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…An implementation of the life-line algorithm in Co-Array Fortran achieved 58% efficiency at 8192 nodes [23]. A more recent UTS code using CAF 2.0 finish construct achieves a 74% parallel efficiency on 32,768 Jaguar cores [42]. In comparison, our code reaches 98% parallel efficiency with 55,680 Power7 cores.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An implementation of the life-line algorithm in Co-Array Fortran achieved 58% efficiency at 8192 nodes [16]. A more recent UTS code using CAF 2.0 finish construct achieves a 74% parallel efficiency on 32,768 Jaguar cores [30]. …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%