Managing Buyer-Supplier Relationships: Empirical Patterns of Strategy Formulation in Industrial Purchasing

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate how industrial buyers align their relationships with suppliers to the contextual characteristics of the purchase. We propose that patterns of purchasing strategy are evidenced, in part, by the alignment of three fundamental domains: the firm's strategic intent for a given purchase, the environment in which a purchase is made, and the type of relationship adopted by industrial buying firms with their selected suppliers. Using a cluster analysis on data collected from 226 buyers in a sample of U.S. industrial firms, we identified four primary types of purchases. Our results provide a partial empirical validation of the purchasing types presented in purchasing portfolio models. However, we identify a fourth type, the adversarial purchase, which cannot be mapped to existing portfolio models. We also found evidence that the dimensions of portfolio models may not be as independent as commonly assumed. We discuss the implications of our findings for practitioners and for research.

The ‘transaction X-ray’: understanding construction procurement

“…To better reflect the range of factors that potentially influence an individual buyer's wider psychological needs, the authors prefer the term 'buyer-specific perceptions of value' (BSPV) rather than use those adopted by Khalifa. Spina et al (2013) and Terpend et al (2011) note both the complexity of the professional buyer's search for value and also of the absence of related empirical studies. Similarly, Brandon-Jones et al (2010) and Hunter et al (2006) highlight a need to reconcile why, although there is considerable research evidence that concentrates on the value added by strengthening operational linkages, evidence suggests that practitioner focus is frequently the reduction of price through competitive tender.…”

Sustainable procurement portfolio management: a case study in a mining company

“…One of the biggest criticisms on the model proposed by Kraljic is that by reducing the issues to two dimensions, the matrix representation does not capture relevant aspects of contemporary business transactions, such as business carried out through company networks (Dubois & Pedersen, 2002); the interdependence between products (Terpend et al, 2011); and the concept of competitive and sustainable advantage in inter-company relationships (Pagell & Wu, 2009). …”

Gestão De Portfólio De Itens De Alavancagem Para Sustentabilidade Em Contratações: Estudo De Caso Em Uma Empresa De Mineração

“…Uma das maiores críticas ao modelo proposto por Kraljic é que, ao reduzir as questões a duas dimensões, a representação matricial acaba por não capturar aspectos relevantes das transações comerciais contemporâneas, tais como: os negócios realizados através de redes de empresas (Dubois e Pendersen, 2002); a interdependência entre produtos (Terpend et al, 2011); e o conceito de vantagem competitiva e sustentável nos relacionamentos interfirmas (Pagell e Wu, 2009 (Rocha, 2012). O GRI foi criado com a intenção de padronizar e melhorar a qualidade dos relatórios de sustentabilidade que começaram a ser gerados sob vários formatos em todo o mundo (Tutillo, 2012).…”