2015
DOI: 10.1504/ijdmb.2015.066334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing changes in distributed biomedical ontologies using hierarchical distributed graph transformation

Abstract: The issue of ontology evolution and change management is inadequately addressed by available tools and algorithms, mostly due to the lack of suitable knowledge representation formalisms to deal with temporal abstract notations and the overreliance on human factors. Also most of the current approaches have been focused on changes within the internal structure of ontologies and interactions with other existing ontologies have been widely neglected. In our research, after revealing and classifying some of the com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the retrieved results, four describe change-based approaches (Kondylakis and Papadakis 2018;Tsalapati et al 2017;Shaban-Nejad and Haarslev 2015;Peixoto et al 2016), while one (Grandi 2016) describes a naïve approach. Bayoudhi et al (2017) tries to bridge the gap between the approaches by materializing both the reference and latest versions.…”
Section: Rq1: What Methods Have Been Used To Represent the Evolution Of Knowledge Over Time?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the retrieved results, four describe change-based approaches (Kondylakis and Papadakis 2018;Tsalapati et al 2017;Shaban-Nejad and Haarslev 2015;Peixoto et al 2016), while one (Grandi 2016) describes a naïve approach. Bayoudhi et al (2017) tries to bridge the gap between the approaches by materializing both the reference and latest versions.…”
Section: Rq1: What Methods Have Been Used To Represent the Evolution Of Knowledge Over Time?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontology evolution, therefore, becomes a necessity and can be employed to identify and model these changes, ensuring that the domain description is up-to-date and remains accurate. Many existing approaches to ontology evolution, however, fail to provide formalisms for temporal abstract notions (Shaban-Nejad and Haarslev 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All updates in the underlying ontologies and semantic structure will be managed through our previously implemented framework [23,24]. As for the target audience, the system is intended for a variety of users depending on the domain, including social workers, health care providers (eg, nurses, physicians), and caregivers (child-parent).…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributed hierarchical graphs form the basis upon which the agent-based OWL semantic web ontological model is built and in which graph transformations can take place at various levels of abstraction [42]. Other interesting hierarchical representations include that of L-Graphs in which edges and nodes are labelled by graphs [41], M -adhesive Graph Transformation Systems [38] that provide a generic algebraic definition to cater for varying graphs types, that of the verbose property graphs used in graph analytics [28], and the implementation found in [45]; that also makes use of attributes and multi-typed sub-graphs.…”
Section: H-graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%