2019
DOI: 10.4102/sajbm.v50i1.467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing conflict and trust as coopetition within alliance partnerships in an emerging economy

Abstract: This study applies a coopetition perspective to articulate the complex interactive nature of conflict and trust between partners, aiming at revealing how specific patterns of conflict (task and emotional) and trust (cognitive and affective) interact with each other in impacting the focal firm's performance within the alliance partnership.Method: Using survey data collected from 490 sampled firms in China, we ran three regression models to test four hypotheses from the interactive matrix between different dimen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(201 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[119,120]); 2) financial outcomes, which are the inverse of the benefits achieved, and therefore are expressed in increased operating costs or reduced revenues [36]; 3) organizational effects, which may have the opposite effect to benefits, i.e., a worsening of the processes involved or less flexible operation [121]; and 4) positional effects, which express a reduction in the bargaining power compared to the entities outside the inter-organizational arrangement [65]. In addition, the frequently indicated risks of cooperation and/or coopetition include a risk of knowledge leakage [106], conflicts between partners [122], and the possibility of opportunistic behaviors appearing [123,124].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[119,120]); 2) financial outcomes, which are the inverse of the benefits achieved, and therefore are expressed in increased operating costs or reduced revenues [36]; 3) organizational effects, which may have the opposite effect to benefits, i.e., a worsening of the processes involved or less flexible operation [121]; and 4) positional effects, which express a reduction in the bargaining power compared to the entities outside the inter-organizational arrangement [65]. In addition, the frequently indicated risks of cooperation and/or coopetition include a risk of knowledge leakage [106], conflicts between partners [122], and the possibility of opportunistic behaviors appearing [123,124].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the existing research in this regard deals mostly either with the multinational organizations’ alliances with the local partners or governments in emerging markets ( Kedia et al , 2016 ) or with the performance related aspects of coopetition ( Shen et al , 2019 ). Thus, little research is available on the relationship between coopetition and innovation among the local SMEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies such as Oxley and Sampson (2004) have highlighted the potential hazards of knowledge leakages on organizational competitiveness. It is believed that such challenges can lead to conflict and subsequently restrain the efficient and effective execution of knowledge management (KM) practices (Shen et al , 2019; Singh and Kant, 2009). However, empirical support for these propositions is scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%