Managing Cost Salience and Procrastination in Projects: Compensation and Team Composition

Abstract

The rising trend of projects with high‐skilled and autonomous contributors increasingly exposes managers to the risk of idiosyncratic individual behaviors. In this article, we examine the effects of an important behavioral factor, an individual's cost salience. Cost salience leads individuals to perceive the cost of immediate effort to be larger than the cost of future effort. This leads to procrastination in early stages and back‐loaded effort over the course of the project. We model the problem confronting the manager of a project whose quality is adversely impacted by such distortion of individual effort over time. Complementary to prior works focused on the planning and scheduling tasks of project management in the absence of human behavior, we find that managers should reward contributions made in earlier stages of a project. Our analysis also yields interesting insights on the project team performance: teams with diverse levels of cost salience will perform better than homogeneous teams. We also address another important facet of team composition, namely, the choice between stable and fluid teams, and find that the practice of creating fluid teams might have previously unrecognized benefits when behavioral aspects of projects are considered. We conclude with insights and organizational implications for project managers.

Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Myopic and Strategic Consumers: Theory and Experiment

“…For example, procrastination, as observed in project management (Wu et al. ) or mental accounting mechanics discussed by Chen et al. () in a newsvendor context are also similar, in spirit, to the pricing biases we observe.…”

The Limits of Planned Obsolescence for Conspicuous Durable Goods

“…A body of literature in operations investigates how a firm's decisions are influenced by different consumer behavioral traits such as forward-looking or strategic consumers (Su 2007, Cachon and Swinney 2009, Su and Zhang 2009, social comparisons (Roels and Su 2014), hyperbolic discounting (Plambeck and Wang 2013), mental accounting (Erat and Bhaskaran 2012), and procrastination (Wu et al 2014) (for an overview, see Netessine and Tang 2009). An emerging stream in this literature examines the effect of snobbish consumer behavior on a firm's production, rationing, and pricing decisions (Tereyagoglu andVeeraraghavan 2012, Arifoglu et al 2012).…”

Workforce flexibility in operations management

“…We noticed the growth of teamwork research in the ORMS area. Yet some related branches such as behavioral issues in teamwork, remain under-researched (e.g., [131]). Advancements in the research on teamwork and behavior are likely to have an important impact on performance.…”