2000
DOI: 10.4141/p99-069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing crop losses from foliar diseases with fungicides, rotation, and tillage in the Saskatchewan Parkland

Abstract: . 2000. Managing crop losses from foliar diseases with fungicides, rotation, and tillage in the Saskatchewan Parkland. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80: 169-175. The effects of three tillage systems, three crop rotations, and fungicide applications were evaluated on diseases of barley, wheat, canola and pea at Melfort, SK, from 1994 to 1998. During these years, reduced tillage did not increase crop losses due to diseases. Four-year rotations with higher proportions of broad-leaved crops and more crop diversity (i.e., can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an earlier study at this location, Bailey et al (2000) indicated that fungicides effectively controlled barley and pea diseases and reduced yield losses. However, fungicides were less effective for wheat and canola diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier study at this location, Bailey et al (2000) indicated that fungicides effectively controlled barley and pea diseases and reduced yield losses. However, fungicides were less effective for wheat and canola diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is high (Tekauz 2003;Turkington et al 2004Turkington et al , 2011Turkington et al , 2012Kutcher et al 2011). Yield losses of up to 20% from these diseases have been reported, while similar yield increases from fungicide have also occurred (Skoropad 1960;Buchannon and Wallace 1962;McDonald and Buchannon 1964;Bailey et al 2000;Ghazvini and Tekauz 2004;Turkington et al 2004;Kutcher et al 2011;Turkington et al 2012). The most important negative impact of leaf diseases is the destruction of photosynthetic leaf area, especially in the upper barley canopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The timing of fungicide application is crucial in blackleg control as the fungicides are not able to control the disease once the pathogen has reached the stem (Steed et al 2007;Peng et al 2012;Liu 2014). Although foliar fungicides have been shown to reduce disease severity and increase yield in blackleg susceptible canola varieties, there is no economic benefit of using fungicide in resistant canola varieties (Bailey et al 2000;Liu 2014). Reduction of disease with yield gain on MR or R-rated cultivars can only be achieved when there is severe erosion of resistance in a cultivar due to pathogen shifts (from Avr to avr) (Liu 2014).…”
Section: Integrated Blackleg Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%