2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing disruptions in the multi-depot vehicle scheduling problem

Abstract: We consider two types of disruptions arising in the multi-depot vehicle scheduling; the delays and the extra trips. These disruptions may or may not occur during operations, and hence they need to be indirectly incorporated into the planned schedule by anticipating their likely occurence times. We present a unique recovery method to handle these potential disruptions. Our method is based on partially swapping two planned routes in such a way that the effect on the planned schedule is minimal, if these disrupti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mahadikar et al [ 30 ] constructed a multi-stage allocation model with the main objective of minimizing the empty movement mileage of trains by considering the capacity of the depot and the demand for the number of vehicles on the train service route. Ucar et al [ 31 ] considered two types of disruptions in the scheduling process of the multi-depot vehicle and proposed a unique recovery method to deal with these potential disruptions, and designed a simultaneous column-and-row generation algorithm to find a valid lower bound of the model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mahadikar et al [ 30 ] constructed a multi-stage allocation model with the main objective of minimizing the empty movement mileage of trains by considering the capacity of the depot and the demand for the number of vehicles on the train service route. Ucar et al [ 31 ] considered two types of disruptions in the scheduling process of the multi-depot vehicle and proposed a unique recovery method to deal with these potential disruptions, and designed a simultaneous column-and-row generation algorithm to find a valid lower bound of the model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to Muter et al (2013) for a in-depth paper on column-and-row generation with column-dependent-rows that oriented our contribution. Some applications of this method consider the multicommodity capacitated fixed-charge network design problem (Gendron and Larose 2014), a railway crew capacity planning problem (Suyabatmaz and Sahin 2015), an integrated airline recovery problem (Maher 2016), disruptions arising in the multidepot vehicle scheduling (Uccar et al 2017), and the one-dimensional two-stage cutting stock problem (Muter and Sezer 2018).…”
Section: Column Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors conclude that, under certain conditions, a single depot vehicle scheduling model performs better. Two types of disruptions arising in the MDVSP were considered: the delays and the extra trips [22]; these disruptions may or may not occur during operations, and they are indirectly incorporated into the planned schedule by anticipating their likely occurrence times. The objective functions more frequently used in a MDVSP are to minimize the total number of vehicles used, the total deadhead time (cost) of the operation, the operation time of the vehicles and a combination of some previous objectives.…”
Section: Some Papers About Vsp Include Implementation Of Models and Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In constraints (16), it is ensured that each task in CT that starts in a PI depot, ends in a PF depot. In constraints (17) and 18 (22) to (24) guarantee that a task that requires a special bus, is performed by a bus with these characteristics. (34) and (35) are the first two terms of the objective function, according to the operators' objectives:…”
Section: Mathematical Programming Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%