2004
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.130.6.753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Disturbing Snoring With Palatal Implants

Abstract: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of polyethylene terephthalate implants in the soft palate to modify disturbing snoring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(25 reference statements)
5
60
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The implants themselves, as well as the surrounding fibrosis, are intended to reduce threedimensional flutter of the soft palate and therefore inspiratory airway resistance [249].…”
Section: Pillar Methods Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implants themselves, as well as the surrounding fibrosis, are intended to reduce threedimensional flutter of the soft palate and therefore inspiratory airway resistance [249].…”
Section: Pillar Methods Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the Pillar Palatal Implant technique was done under local anesthesia to patients who did not show any signs of retropalatal obstruction. Operations were applied according to a classic route (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reactive fibrotic state is made by inserting 3 implants into the soft palate. This intervention reduces vibration of the soft palate and decrease air flow-induced turbulence, thereby leading reduced snoring (6,7,8,9). It can be done under local anesthesia in an office setting with minimal preoperative and postoperative pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fibers induce a chronic inflammatory response that creates a fibrous capsule around the implants. This inflammatory reaction is designed to reduce the soft palate flutter and collapsibility that contribute to sleep-disordered breathing at the velopharyngeal level [170]. There are conflicting reports regarding the efficacy of pillar implants.…”
Section: Soft Palatal Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%