2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2018.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing energy, performance and cost in large scale heterogeneous datacenters using migrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As, there are two instances running during the migration duration (one on source host and a second one on the target host); the energy cost relates to the consumed energy by the least energy efficient host [11]. Moreover, in our evaluation, we account for 10% performance degradation due to migration that is merely modelled based on the memory, disk size and available network bandwidth [1], [23]; however, complete network heterogeneity is not within the scope of this paper. Similarly, co-locating 18 VMs when they compete for similar resources can also degrade VMs performance [31].…”
Section: Validation Using Experimental Results (Planetlab Dataset)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As, there are two instances running during the migration duration (one on source host and a second one on the target host); the energy cost relates to the consumed energy by the least energy efficient host [11]. Moreover, in our evaluation, we account for 10% performance degradation due to migration that is merely modelled based on the memory, disk size and available network bandwidth [1], [23]; however, complete network heterogeneity is not within the scope of this paper. Similarly, co-locating 18 VMs when they compete for similar resources can also degrade VMs performance [31].…”
Section: Validation Using Experimental Results (Planetlab Dataset)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an experimental point of view, when a particular application is being migrated from one host to another host, the impact of host heterogeneity is added as an increase or a decrease in application's runtime. Further details on these parameters and the mapping mechanism to model resource and application heterogeneities can be found in [11], [23]. Povray benchmarks on E5430, E5-2650 and E5645; where, E5430 performs better than E5645 [11] We extend the PowerHost class of the CloudSim simulator to account for platform heterogeneities.…”
Section: Modelling Resource and Application Heterogeneitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work guarantees that all the tasks fulfil their deadlines with reduced system power consumption. Servers or processing units are the most power consuming equipment's in datacentres [20]. It is very clear from our previous figures that the ratio of power is very small, when a CPU is 100% utilized and when it is idle.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Our future work will investigate these types of scheduling impacts over energy efficiency, workload performance, and users' monetary costs [20], [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, we aim to develop cloud-based systems know as Urban Flow that can check the real-time crowd flow prediction. If we implement the training module on the cloud and then the prediction model is implemented on the edge computing or small data centre, then the benefit is that each vehicle should quickly predict and take appropriate decisions for re-routing to avoid crowed or traffic congestion [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43]. For that, we need to deploy fog devices on local regions such as shopping malls or mobile base stations, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%