2006 1st International Conference on Digital Information Management 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icdim.2007.369324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Evolution in Software-Engineering Knowledge Management Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dichotomy between explicit and tacit knowledge is vital, and is essential in understanding the challenges in the KM discipline. Tacit knowledge is known as individual knowledge that results from interaction between individuals or groups of people (Mohamed et al, 2006). On the other hand, explicit knowledge is viewed as being procedural or declarative knowledge (Anderson, 1983).…”
Section: Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dichotomy between explicit and tacit knowledge is vital, and is essential in understanding the challenges in the KM discipline. Tacit knowledge is known as individual knowledge that results from interaction between individuals or groups of people (Mohamed et al, 2006). On the other hand, explicit knowledge is viewed as being procedural or declarative knowledge (Anderson, 1983).…”
Section: Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the deletion of critical cases can significantly reduce the competence of a CBR system, rendering certain classes of target problems permanently unsolvable [16]. Further details about artificial forgetting can be explored in ( [17], [18], [2], [19]). …”
Section: Machine Forgettingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, there must be a continual maintenance of knowledge captured by these systems. knowledge evolution issue has not been addressed so far [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%