2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing fertiliser nitrogen to reduce nitrous oxide emissions and emission intensities from a cultivated Cambisol in Scotland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This can partly be explained by the smaller application rates in the earlier doses (Table 2), and thus the lower level of soil mineral N available for nitrification and denitrification until after the final application, but also by the rainfall and soil moisture status at these times. The fact that the time lag between final fertiliser application and peak N 2 O emissions was shortest at Gilchriston suggests either a lower mineral N threshold for N 2 O production at this site, or that other environmental thresholds were crossed before soil N had peaked at this site, allowing the production of N 2 O (also see Hinton et al, 2015). Although soil mineral N remained high at Rosemaund after fertiliser application it was not accompanied by further N 2 O emission peaks, indicating that other limiting factors, in particular rainfall, must have prevented the production of N 2 O, emphasising the complex nature of this process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This can partly be explained by the smaller application rates in the earlier doses (Table 2), and thus the lower level of soil mineral N available for nitrification and denitrification until after the final application, but also by the rainfall and soil moisture status at these times. The fact that the time lag between final fertiliser application and peak N 2 O emissions was shortest at Gilchriston suggests either a lower mineral N threshold for N 2 O production at this site, or that other environmental thresholds were crossed before soil N had peaked at this site, allowing the production of N 2 O (also see Hinton et al, 2015). Although soil mineral N remained high at Rosemaund after fertiliser application it was not accompanied by further N 2 O emission peaks, indicating that other limiting factors, in particular rainfall, must have prevented the production of N 2 O, emphasising the complex nature of this process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The most important factors are soil moisture, soil carbon content, and soil pH31323334. For example, nitrate-containing fertilizers such as AN tend to release more N 2 O if denitrification is supported by wet and therefore partly anaerobic soil conditions accompanied by high soluble soil carbon content353637. Whereas urea and ammonium fertilizers can release higher rates of N 2 O under rather dry conditions3839.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hinton et al. () found EFs from 0.44% to 0.56% for the five weeks following AN application, but annual EFs of 1.36, 0.9%6 and 1.08% for AN application rates of 120, 160 and 200 kg N ha −1 at the Scottish arable site. Smith et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumulative fluxes were calculated using the trapezoidal rule (area under the curve) to interpolate fluxes between sampling days (Bell, Hinton, et al., ; Bell, Rees, et al., ; Bell et al., ; Hinton et al., ) as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%