Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2004
DOI: 10.1145/1030397.1030426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing inconsistent repositories via prioritized repairs

Abstract: Whenever a group of authors collaboratively edits interrelated documents, semantic consistency is a major goal. Current document management systems (DMS) lack adequate consistency management facilities. We propose liberal use of formal consistency rules, which permits inconsistencies. In this paper we focus on deriving repairs for inconsistencies. Our major contributions are: (1) deriving (common) repairs for multiple rules, (2) resolving conflicts between repairs, (3) prioritizing repairs, and (4) support for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, their approach only supports "=" and " =" as predicates and, thereby, cannot handle models like eCos. Scheffczyk et al [20] enhance Nentwich et al's approach by generating concrete fixes. However, this approach requires manually writing fix generation procedures for each use of a predicate in every constraint, which is not suitable for variability models, often containing hundreds of constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, their approach only supports "=" and " =" as predicates and, thereby, cannot handle models like eCos. Scheffczyk et al [20] enhance Nentwich et al's approach by generating concrete fixes. However, this approach requires manually writing fix generation procedures for each use of a predicate in every constraint, which is not suitable for variability models, often containing hundreds of constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conjecture that the contributions of this paper are a good basis to offer such import capabilities for office documents as well. This enables premier support for sophisticated change management such as incremental link conformance analysis [15] or further semantic consistency checks [19,23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 visualizes our approach to this task. Since there are well-established frameworks where semantic connections between documents are modeled using first order predicate logic (FOPL) [2,3], we use FOPL definitions of concepts. As with interfaces in programming languages, each concept has a concept interface that can be implemented for several contexts.…”
Section: Document Semantics: Contexts and Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%