Managing individual research productivity in academic organizations: A review of the evidence and a path forward

Ryazanova, Olga; Jaškienė, Jolanta

doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104448

Cited by 29 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 97 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, as suggested by Kieser et al (2015), scholars need to investigate how the results of scientific research are utilized in management practice. This is evident within the CSR and sustainability field due to external pressures on academic science to prove its value for society (Ryazanova & Jaskiene, 2022). Our results, highlighting academic–corporate collaboration, could reduce this trade‐off and incentivize scholars to expand their view of the research nexus to include the third mission of the university.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric performance analysis of publication productivity in the corporate social responsibility field: Outcomes ofSciValanalytics

Cucari

Tutore

Montera

et al. 2022

Corp Soc Responsibility Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) research in academia has been increasing over time, especially in recent years. Thus, the evaluation of relative research productivity is becoming increasingly relevant due to the current importance of this topic. The paper aims to investigate research productivity in the CSR field by performing a bibliometric analysis. An iterative search strategy was used to firstly identify productive CSR authors and then examine their productivity over a 5‐year period (2015–2020) using the SciVal tool by Elsevier. Drawing on the results from different bibliometric analyses, the study investigates quantitative and qualitative publication performance at the country (macro), institutional (meso) and individual (micro) levels. This study is the first bibliometric analysis on CSR that is not related to a specific journal and has a multi‐level nature by providing the groundwork in determining the knowledge structure of CSR.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric performance analysis of publication productivity in the corporate social responsibility field: Outcomes ofSciValanalytics

Cucari

Tutore

Montera

et al. 2022

Corp Soc Responsibility Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We used dummy variables for the degree (PhD) and the academic ranks (professor, senior researcher, lead researcher and junior research levels for those affiliated with university research laboratories). Teacher status was also controlled for, as it was known to impact research productivity negatively (Ryazanova & Jaskiene, 2022; Zhang & Shin, 2015).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond borders: Achieving research performance breakthrough with academic collaborations

Veretennik

Shakina

2023

Higher Education Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaborative research papers are widely acknowledged to be more impactful than single‐authored studies in higher education amidst subject area known to alter citation counts. While preceding studies have mostly recognised these two as the antecedents of research impact separately, it needs to be clarified whether the interaction of research area and type of collaboration causes any moderation. Comprehensive knowledge of differences in impact caused by a certain combination of type and area is important because, if citation impact is associated only with a particular combination, the impact‐based research stimulation programs without regard to combination consequences may be cost‐ineffective if not self‐destructing. This study investigates how research collaborations in academia impact the productivity and impact of university faculty. The focus is on the impact variation due to the type of academic collaboration (internal, domestic, international) and the research area. For the empirical test of this study, publicly open data from 1368 faculty in one of the leading Russian higher education institutions—HSE University. Results have two‐fold nature. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) researchers are more likely to collaborate with domestic co‐authors. This result accentuates the specifics of the academic traditions in the research areas highly recognised for having a long and successful history and worldwide impact on science. The collaborations built on international coauthorship are associated with higher publication visibility rates for researchers from emerging fields in Russia, like those in social sciences and humanities, whereas institutional collaborations are found to be positively related to the share of cited documents. This article sheds light on the differences in academic collaboration mechanisms influencing research productivity and impact in two distinct research areas. It invites revisiting policies stimulating collaborative activities in universities, demonstrating their potentially discrepant consequences. The study's substantial contribution also refers to the use of panel data on personal attributes, research productivity and impact, which is a rare case for research collaboration studies.

show abstract

“…Thus, social sciences and humanities need more means to secure sufficient research funding (T. H. T. Pham & Hayden, 2019;Pho & Tran, 2016). Because women obtain lower academic ranks and have fewer research publication outputs than their male counterparts, it is hard for them to reach the research funding chamber crowded with senior faculties (Ryazanova & Jaskiene, 2022;UNESCO, 2015;Vo˜& Laking, 2020). Accordingly, women's faculties appear to have severe occupational stress due to the notable dominance of their male counterparts (T. L. H. Nguyen, 2013;Van Thanh, 2016).…”

Section: Gender and Academic Discipline In Vietnamese Higher Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, women faculty experience difficulty obtaining full professorship, although they work in women's universities where none of the faculty is male (Khalid & Tadesse, 2022). This evidence highlights that women faculties who obtained associate and full professorship are less productive (Knepper et al, 2020), or there is no difference (Padilla-Gonzalez et al, 2011;Ryazanova & Jaskiene, 2022) from their equivalent-rank male faculties who extensively published.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing Apples With Apples: Women Faculty Research Productivity in Vietnamese Higher Education

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For decades, abundant studies have illustrated the vast scholarly publication disparity between male and women academics. Exhaustingly, in 21st-century higher education, women’s academic research participation is below the world average, except in a few countries that comprehensively studied their faculties and personal and institutional agencies to restore parity. Higher education is widely discussed in Vietnam as incompetent academics with a shred of scholarly publications and venerable gender disparities. Hence, the current study sought to contribute robust policy and practical implications for stakeholders by inspecting women’s faculties solely to shed light on the root hindrances of their scholarly share. Remarkably, the findings of the study demonstrate that women faculty members have promising scholarly contributions in disciplines where women scientists are marginalized, that having children becomes a notable motivator for mothers in academia, and that there is genuine support from a husband who understands the worth of his wife’s research contribution to the institution and family.

show abstract

Managing individual research productivity in academic organizations: A review of the evidence and a path forward

Cited by 29 publications

References 97 publications

A bibliometric performance analysis of publication productivity in the corporate social responsibility field: Outcomes ofSciValanalytics

A bibliometric performance analysis of publication productivity in the corporate social responsibility field: Outcomes ofSciValanalytics

Beyond borders: Achieving research performance breakthrough with academic collaborations

Comparing Apples With Apples: Women Faculty Research Productivity in Vietnamese Higher Education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About