DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8268-9.ch005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Knowledge at Tourism Destinations

Abstract: Today, knowledge has become a pivotal tool of implementing strategies and approaches to achieve desired results. During the recent past, researches on knowledge management have grown rapidly in the management literature and tourism is no exception in this context. Moreover, the recent developments in tourism and hospitality marketplace have recognised knowledge as a key competitive tool and a determinant for socio-economic growth at destinations. Thus, it is obvious that if a tourism destination/nation/organis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce single-respondent bias, the questionnaire was focused on individuals who visited FFRs more or less frequently, since their information is more reliable than that given by individuals who are not fast-food customers. In addition, the comprehensive data collection process and extensive sampling minimized the risk of singlerespondent bias (Kumar, 2015). Following Podsakoff et al (2012), to reduce common method bias risk related to a single respondent for dependent and independent constructs, the questionnaire was conducted in different groups and sequences.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce single-respondent bias, the questionnaire was focused on individuals who visited FFRs more or less frequently, since their information is more reliable than that given by individuals who are not fast-food customers. In addition, the comprehensive data collection process and extensive sampling minimized the risk of singlerespondent bias (Kumar, 2015). Following Podsakoff et al (2012), to reduce common method bias risk related to a single respondent for dependent and independent constructs, the questionnaire was conducted in different groups and sequences.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%