Managing knowledge reuse: the duality of innovator personality

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide new insights for managing knowledge reuse in terms of the duality of innovator personality. Continuously developing new products is crucial for firms to maintain and enhance their competitive advantages. However, the limited and highly specialized knowledge can cause innovators of firms to face difficulties in the process of new product development (NPD). In this setting, knowledge reuse becomes a solution that may benefit innovators to overcome the innovation dilemma. Given the fact that innovators with different personality are likely to form incongruent cognitions and affection on knowledge reuse, thus subsequently affecting the performance of NPD, there is an urgent need to investigate the effects of innovator personality in the entire process of knowledge reuse. Design/methodology/approach This paper exploits five-factor model (FFM) of personality to comprehensively investigate the dual effects of innovator personality in managing knowledge reuse based on the two distinct sets of knowledge reuse initiation and implementation. Findings By using the data from 981 innovators of knowledge-intensive firms in China, this study finds that the FFM traits of conscientiousness and agreeableness had opposing effects on initiation and implementation of knowledge reuse. While the FFM traits of emotional stability and openness to experience both positively affect the knowledge reuse initiation and implementation. Moreover, the FFM traits of extraversion benefit the shaping of knowledge reuse initiation whereas encumbering the implementation of knowledge reuse. Originality/value First, this study reveals the different roles of cognitive and affective traits of personality in shaping knowledge reuse. Second, this study exposes the role of innovator personality in determining the performance effects of knowledge reuse implementation. Third, this study highlights the dual effects of innovator personality in managing knowledge reuse. This study offers evidence for arranging the innovators with appropriate FFM traits in various stages of knowledge reuse.

Knowledge ambidexterity in construction project-based organizations: predicaments of knowledge networking intention within outbound consultant-supplier interfaces

“…In this way, procedural and learning inertia can be alleviated. In contrast, these knowledge flows help organisations with experience inertia (success and failure stories) identify avenues for more opportunities in KNI (Jia et al, 2022;Zhao et al, 2023). Therefore, we formulate the following hypotheses:…”

“…A firm with EI indicates that it has accumulated substantial experience and knowledge (Jia et al, 2022). Such tacit and explicit experience enables firms to conduct their own business relying on their experience/ knowledge (Zhao et al, 2023), but also handle challenging issues that cannot be solved by existing knowledge or technologies (Jia et al, 2022). The fact that EI is characterised by lessons learned (failure and success stories), warrants a stepping stone towards experience accumulation (Chen et al, 2021;Jia et al, 2022).…”

How work-family conflict affects knowledge workers' innovative behavior: a spillover-crossover-spillover model of dual-career couples

“…The antecedents of innovative behavior can be categorized into individual, leader-related and organizational factors. Considering individual factors, previous studies have investigated the impact of individual personality (Zhao et al , 2022), individual perceptions such as job insecurity, thriving at work (Riaz et al , 2018) and individual behavior such as employee voice (Botha and Steyn, 2022) on innovative behavior. As to leader-related factors, leadership styles such as transformational leadership (Choi et al , 2016) and servant leadership (Khan et al , 2022) have been discussed.…”

Converting inventions into innovations to address cancer grand challenges: The role of scientific and digital search intensity

“…In turn, a broader view of the potential solutions to addressing the root causes generating a disease may increase emerging recombination opportunities that researchers can scrutinize during the R&D process (Fleming & Sorenson, 2004; Gambardella, 1995; Gruber et al, 2013; Natalicchio et al, 2017). In other words, as pointed out in the literature on knowledge search and recombination, by leveraging a larger extent of scientific knowledge, a researcher may spot and concurrently evaluate different directions of development that can lead to valuable inventions (Fleming & Sorenson, 2004; Gambardella, 1995; Gong et al, 2023; Gruber et al, 2013; Nelson & Winter, 1982; Zhao et al, 2023). Therefore, among the different paths of invention development, it is likely that the researcher may spot a noticeably promising one that may lead them toward the development of an effective invention that can promptly and smoothly be used to develop a new drug, thereby reducing its time‐to‐approval.…”