2005
DOI: 10.1890/04-0906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Landscapes for Conservation Under Uncertainty

Abstract: Abstract. In ecology, populations may be linked conceptually with landscapes through habitat and spatial population models. Usually, these models deal with single species and treat a range of uncertainties implicitly and explicitly. They assist managers in testing different management scenarios and making strategic decisions. Landscape pattern analysis was the first attempt to deal with multiple species, and it led to a range of landscape management strategies. Advances in landscape ecology, driven largely by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
133
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
133
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They can shift significantly as more and better-quality data become available. Priorities may also be founded on subjective impressions, or be swayed by political influence, context dependence, and motivational bias (Burgman et al 2005). Most importantly, conservation investment based on priorities fed by poor data is more likely to fall short of its Fig.…”
Section: When Data and Capacity Are Inadequatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can shift significantly as more and better-quality data become available. Priorities may also be founded on subjective impressions, or be swayed by political influence, context dependence, and motivational bias (Burgman et al 2005). Most importantly, conservation investment based on priorities fed by poor data is more likely to fall short of its Fig.…”
Section: When Data and Capacity Are Inadequatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reyers et al 2002), and is essential for efficient surveying. Standardization is a prerequisite to quantify uncertainty, and estimation of false absences is the first step towards managing landscapes for conservation under uncertainty (Burgman et al 2005).…”
Section: Methods Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…acresce o facto dos factores ambientais que controlam a distribuição das espécies e comunidades se modificarem em função da escala, o que torna difícil a sua redução (downscaling) e a sua aplicabilidade em pequenas áreas. ao invés, o carácter predictivo do sDM permite a obtenção da distribuição das espécies, comunidades e adequabilidade de habitat, podendo ainda este modelo integrar e responder a impactos de mudanças ambientais, quer sejam motivadas por alterações climáticas ou devido às dinâmicas de transformação do uso e ocupação do solo (wu e smeins, 2000;g ibson et al, 2004;rushton et al, 2004;araújo et al, 2005a;Burgman et al, 2005;wisz et al, 2008). Portanto, é fundamental definir o padrão e a escala de análise (elton, 1927; scott et al, 2002), em que o objectivo poderá basear-se apenas na carac terização geral dos factores que determinam a distribuição e ocorrência das espécies e comunidades proveniente de cartografia de referência a uma escala regional ou global ou, por outro lado, no desenvolvimento de cartografia predictiva desde a escala local à global assente em diferentes técnicas de modelação (Cumming, 2000;segurado e araújo, 2004;thuiller et al, 2004;araújo et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Vegetação Natural Potencial (Vnp) E Os Modelos De Distribuiçunclassified