2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-4012(03)00070-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing large-scale global enterprise resource planning systems: a case study at Texas Instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of these are particularly surprising or indeed original, as many have been identified in previous studies (e.g., Iivari & Igbaria, 1997;Jiang & Klein, 1999;Kirs et al, 2001;Sarkis & Sundarraj, 2003); nevertheless, the case provides further evidence of their importance in relation to successful IS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…None of these are particularly surprising or indeed original, as many have been identified in previous studies (e.g., Iivari & Igbaria, 1997;Jiang & Klein, 1999;Kirs et al, 2001;Sarkis & Sundarraj, 2003); nevertheless, the case provides further evidence of their importance in relation to successful IS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Jiang & Klein (1999), for example, suggest that lack of system success can be related to risks inherent in the development process, including non-existent or unwilling users, multiple users, personnel turnover, inability to specify purpose, lack of management support, lack of user experience, and technical complexity. Sarkis & Sundarraj (2003), in the context of their study of a successful IS implementation at Texas Instruments, identify important lessons (or factors) that relate to strategic planning. These are: aligning IT with the business, top management support, addressing change management issues, rationalising business processes, identifying the importance of intangible issues, and focusing on metrics.…”
Section: Information Systems Failure and Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] evaluated some ERP models and their success and failure factors. Tan, etc.…”
Section: Technology Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] proposed a methodology with activity-based metric measurement models to evaluate the performance of the process flows, including activity, product information, resource, cost, cash, and profit, within manufacturing enterprises. Sarkis and Sundarraj [15] discovered that approximately two-thirds of ERP systems are said to be failure. Evgeniou [16] investigated that organizations are stuck on either suffering from lack of information visibility across enterprise or suffering from information flexibility.…”
Section: Technology Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The business wanted to focus on meeting customer needs in a uniform fashion, but still allow flexibility to respond to changing needs, as the company could no longer afford to have ad hoc processing to accommodate the customer (Sarkis and Sundarraj, 2003). The goal of the technology structure was to be open and allow use of the Internet, as they wanted to change the business from a local response to a unified global effort in the marketplace.…”
Section: Texas Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%