Managing learning in informal innovation networks: overcoming the Daphne‐dilemma

Abstract

In this article we discuss the nature and productivity of informal innovation networks, i.e. informal collaborative arrangements between organizations engaged in product or process innovation. Such networks can be used in any phase of the innovation process, but their informal nature makes them especially suited for its fuzzy front end. We explore their potential in technology exchange and learning on the basis of a combination of organization network theory and knowledge management theory. We discuss issues in network governance and network operational management and discuss the basic dilemma ± which we named the Daphne-dilemma ± facing attempts to improve the productivity of informal innovation networks: too little management effort may lead to under-exploitation of their potential and poor productivity, but too much management effort may destroy their informal nature and hence their creative and explorative potential.

Cooperative learning in creating and managing joint ventures

“…This risk diminishes if there is previous experience of developing cooperation agreements, especially between the same partners, as this past experience generates mutual understanding and trust which fosters the creation of more flexible control structures in future cooperation (Gulati, 1995;Ring & Van de Ven, 1992Rodenbach & Brettel, 2012). Van Aken and Weggeman (2000) state that informal cooperation agreements are based more on trust and mutual understanding than on legal obligations. Therefore, we believe that a certain amount of existing previous trust among partners is necessary in creating cooperation agreements with more flexible structures.…”

“…Trust among partners plays an essential role in cooperation agreements (Van Aken & Weggeman, 2000). From an organisational perspective, Axelrod (1984) andZucker (1987), together with other authors, see trust between cooperating firms as an expression of assurance between the different parties or an exchange of some sort (a type of trust that will not be placed at risk by the actions of the other party).…”

Customization as a business strategy--a barrier to customer integration in product development?

“…That is, it requires a certain amount of assets to be developed over time (as knowledge, values and relationships). This result, in relation to the fact that research about informal information networks have lagged behind, compared with studies of formal innovation networks, such as alliances, as also pointed out by van Aken & Weggeman (2000), points out the relevance of initiating studies about how relationships to external learning partners are created and developed, and what the prerequisites are for establishing and developing such relationships on an individual, a group and a corporate level. In this study, one prerequisite identi® ed, which immediately appeared as important, was that companies have to reveal something about themselves in order to motivate external partners to be integrated in their PD.…”

Mapeando as relações de coprodução e codistribuição no cinema brasileiro: uma análise pela ótica da teoria de redes

“…For Van Aken and Weggeman (2000), every organisation or individual is involved in some form of network, but some structural and managerial aspects determine the formation of networks in the environment, which can, according to Hutt et al (2000), present a higher density ratio from actors who engage in horizontal and vertical alliances in search of congruent goals. For Fensterseifer et al (1997), strong conceptual evidence of networks is presented in the identification of partnerships, cooperation, association and complementarity between organisations and individuals, assuming that in the current business environment, no company, small or large, is independent and self-sufficient.…”