2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-2757-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Maintenance Strategy

Abstract: The ''manage strategy'' process coordinates and integrates maintenance management activities in order to achieve the department objectives [20, 32]. This process also analyzes that these objectives are aligned with company's goals (see Fig. 6.1).This process is also responsible for leading and controlling continuous improvement and knowledge management for the of the maintenance objectives. By managing strategy we provide consistency to the maintenance actions, ensuring proper department orientation and viabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the reason why the value of CR is slightly larger than 0.10 but in fact the DM have been interviewed twice, maybe this is because for humans (and the DM is human), it is (often) not easy to compare 7 items pairwisely in a shot, as 7 have reached the range of 'unlucky numbers' (7 6 2) of any AHP-style investigation. 34,35 For this matter, some further studies can be conducted to solidify the results (e.g. to totally and strictly pass the CR check according to the threshold defined by Saaty, instead of 'approximately passed').…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the reason why the value of CR is slightly larger than 0.10 but in fact the DM have been interviewed twice, maybe this is because for humans (and the DM is human), it is (often) not easy to compare 7 items pairwisely in a shot, as 7 have reached the range of 'unlucky numbers' (7 6 2) of any AHP-style investigation. 34,35 For this matter, some further studies can be conducted to solidify the results (e.g. to totally and strictly pass the CR check according to the threshold defined by Saaty, instead of 'approximately passed').…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are because the comparisons are, in fact, too complicated because the number of criteria has reached 7, which should be around the suggested upper bound for any AHP survey, while the psychological limit of human brain exists for simultaneous comparisons of 7 6 2 items. 34,35 Table 2 is named as matrix B for subsequent processes. A short break is required here to illustrate the format of and the meaning of the numbers presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Obtaining the Criteria Weight Vector Using Ahpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one of them was interviewed twice and one of them was interviewed for the third time to pass the check. This also reflects the fact that our teaching material had let the hierarchy not exceed the psychological limit of 'the number of items to be compared for human by using AHP' [75][76][77]. Methodologically speaking, this is exactly a good effect from organizing the considered criteria under an additional layer of constructs.…”
Section: The Opinion Groupmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For the problem that is used in this study, each of the 3 DMs would undergo 6 rounds of questions to fill 1 matrix during the first stage and 5 matrices during the second, which is a total of 18 matrices for the source data. As with long pairwise comparisons some psychological limits of human brain do exist, this impacts the precision of the collected source data when making an AHP survey (Fernández & Márquez, 2012;Márquez, 2007). In contrast, the discussed survey style for the IF-MADM approach involves only one stage of investigation and avoids these problems to some extent.…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%