Over the last 60 years, the United States has accepted some two million refugees for resettlement. Standard opinion polls suggest that the American response to these refugees has been mixed. Yet, despite much ambivalence about particular refugees and where they may belong in the grid of American social and cultural categories, the notion of refuge and the imperative toward support and welcome to refugees endure. As an extended example, this paper considers press treatment of refugees in Richmond, Virginia during the last quarter of the twentieth century*before security concerns and surging numbers of illegal immigrants irrevocably changed the nature of American immigration. Unlike the ambivalent response that emerges in national opinion polls and some other venues, in this case the construction of refugees is neither negative nor ambivalent, but is instead solidly positive. This positive construction extends across a broad range of racial and national-origin groups and is conditioned by a peculiarly American notion of how refugees relate to broader American categories, particularly that of 'immigrant'. In this local story from the United States lies a broader tale of how refugees are woven into the existing social and cultural categories of the countries in which they resettle.Since the mid-twentieth century, American involvement in refugee resettlement has developed from an ad hoc, largely voluntary-agency-managed programme to a very formal, regulated one with the strong involvement of federal and state governments. Over that same period, the numbers and origins of refugees have shifted greatly. Although the majority of refugees who have been admitted reflect specific American interests, particularly opposition to communist regimes, national origins and cultural backgrounds have nevertheless been diverse*sometimes representing resumption of prior migration flows (as with Cubans and many Eastern Europeans), yet sometimes